540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25274486)
1. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for hysterectomy and pelvic organ prolapse repair.
Paraiso MF
Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):933-8. PubMed ID: 25274486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
Rosenblum N
Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of robotic surgery on pelvic floor reconstruction.
Giannini A; Russo E; Malacarne E; Cecchi E; Mannella P; Simoncini T
Minerva Ginecol; 2019 Feb; 71(1):4-17. PubMed ID: 30318878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost analysis when open surgeons perform minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Shepherd JP; Kantartzis KL; Ahn KH; Bonidie MJ; Lee T
JSLS; 2014; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 25489215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic-assisted surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 22136216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
Ross JW; Preston MR
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Review of extraperitoneal sacrocolpopexy as a technique for advanced uterine and vault prolapse.
Onol FF; Onol SY
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Aug; 24(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 22614674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted Transvaginal Single-site Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Guan X; Guan Z; Koythong T; Liu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 28(6):1141. PubMed ID: 33249270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-assisted techniques and outcomes in the realm of pelvic reconstructive surgery.
Parnell BA; Matthews CA
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):412-9. PubMed ID: 21857171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Innovations in minimally invasive hysterectomy.
Ridgeway B; Falcone T
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Mar; 57(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 24145361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
Wright JD; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Burke WM; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Herzog TJ; Hershman DL
JAMA; 2013 Feb; 309(7):689-98. PubMed ID: 23423414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Crigler B; Zakaria M; Hart S
Surg Technol Int; 2012 Dec; 22():195-202. PubMed ID: 23225594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer.
Desille-Gbaguidi H; Hebert T; Paternotte-Villemagne J; Gaborit C; Rush E; Body G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Dec; 171(2):348-52. PubMed ID: 24135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
