These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25274911)

  • 1. The relationship between operative and radiographic acetabular component orientation: which factors influence resultant cup orientation?
    Grammatopoulos G; Pandit HG; da Assunção R; McLardy-Smith P; De Smet KA; Gill HS; Murray DW
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1290-7. PubMed ID: 25274911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Safe Zone Range for Cup Anteversion Is Narrower Than for Inclination in THA.
    Murphy WS; Yun HH; Hayden B; Kowal JH; Murphy SB
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Feb; 476(2):325-335. PubMed ID: 29529664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.
    Takada R; Jinno T; Miyatake K; Hirao M; Yagishita K; Yoshii T; Okawa A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 105(5):915-922. PubMed ID: 31204181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of native anatomy with recommended safe component orientation in total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis.
    Merle C; Grammatopoulos G; Waldstein W; Pegg E; Pandit H; Aldinger PR; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Nov; 95(22):e172. PubMed ID: 24257672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgeons' Accuracy in Achieving Their Desired Acetabular Component Orientation.
    Grammatopoulos G; Alvand A; Monk AP; Mellon S; Pandit H; Rees J; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Sep; 98(17):e72. PubMed ID: 27605697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of the anterior pelvic plane for computer navigated acetabular component placement during total hip arthroplasty: prospective study with the EOS imaging system.
    Barbier O; Skalli W; Mainard L; Mainard D;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2014 Oct; 100(6 Suppl):S287-91. PubMed ID: 25129705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standing radiological analysis with a low-dose biplanar imaging system (EOS system) of the position of the components in total hip arthroplasty using an anterior approach: a cohort study of 102 patients.
    Morvan A; Moreau S; Combourieu B; Pansard E; Marmorat JL; Carlier R; Judet T; Lonjon G
    Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):326-33. PubMed ID: 26920957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring Acetabular Cup Orientation on Antero-Posterior Radiographs of the Hip after Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Vector Arithmetic Radiological Method. Is It Valid and Verified for Daily Clinical Practice?
    Craiovan B; Weber M; Worlicek M; Schneider M; Springorum HR; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Rofo; 2016 Jun; 188(6):574-81. PubMed ID: 27093395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting?
    Delagrammaticas DE; Ochenjele G; Rosenthal BD; Assenmacher B; Manning DW; Stover MD
    Hip Int; 2020 Jan; 30(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31387397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement.
    Eilander W; Harris SJ; Henkus HE; Cobb JP; Hogervorst T
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1326-31. PubMed ID: 24078527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cadaver study validating CT assessment of acetabular component orientation: the Perth CT hip protocol.
    Arora V; Hannan R; Beaver R; Fletcher T; Harvie P
    Skeletal Radiol; 2017 Feb; 46(2):177-183. PubMed ID: 27826701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Bayraktar V; Weber M; von Kunow F; Zeman F; Craiovan B; Renkawitz T; Grifka J; Woerner M
    Int Orthop; 2017 Apr; 41(4):731-738. PubMed ID: 27277948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Isolated acetabular revision with femoral stem retention using computed tomography-based navigation.
    Kubota Y; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Kataoka M; Tsumura H
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 31522901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of coordinate-system construction methods on postoperative computed tomography evaluation of implant orientation after total hip arthroplasty.
    Kyo T; Nakahara I; Kuroda Y; Miki H
    Comput Aided Surg; 2015; 20(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 26290170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiographic evaluation of the results of total hip arthroplasty with the cementless Zweymüller endoprosthesis.
    Pietrzak K; Piślewski Z; Strzyzewski W; Pucher A; Kaczmarek W
    Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(4):310-9. PubMed ID: 20876924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acetabular component orientation in intra- and postoperative positions in total hip arthroplasty.
    Hayakawa K; Minoda Y; Aihara M; Sakawa A; Ohzono K; Tada K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2009 Sep; 129(9):1151-6. PubMed ID: 18427818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new technique for radiographic measurement of acetabular cup orientation.
    Derbyshire B; Diggle PJ; Ingham CJ; Macnair R; Wimhurst J; Jones HW
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):369-72. PubMed ID: 23896357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Component Placement in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Redmond JM; Gupta A; Hammarstedt JE; Petrakos A; Stake CE; Domb BG
    Orthopedics; 2016 May; 39(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 27064781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Targeting a New Safe Zone: A Step in the Development of Patient-Specific Component Positioning for Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    McLawhorn AS; Sculco PK; Weeks KD; Nam D; Mayman DJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Jun; 44(6):270-6. PubMed ID: 26046997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.