These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
738 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25274911)
21. Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Lin F; Lim D; Wixson RL; Milos S; Hendrix RW; Makhsous M Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Oct; 23(8):1004-11. PubMed ID: 18541352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of computer navigation for acetabular component placement in THA. Ryan JA; Jamali AA; Bargar WL Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Jan; 468(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 19629609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Planning-Assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Sariali E; Boukhelifa N; Catonne Y; Pascal Moussellard H J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 98(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 26791031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device. Jacob I; Benson J; Shanaghan K; Gonzalez Della Valle A Int Orthop; 2020 Mar; 44(3):429-435. PubMed ID: 31965312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability of cup position in navigated THA in the lateral decubitus position using the 'flip technique'. Carcangiu A; D'Arrigo C; Topa D; Alonzo R; Speranza A; De Sanctis S; Ferretti A Hip Int; 2011; 21(6):700-5. PubMed ID: 22135017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The difference between the radiographic and the operative angle of inclination of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: use of a digital protractor and the circumference of the hip to improve orientation. Meermans G; Goetheer-Smits I; Lim RF; Van Doorn WJ; Kats J Bone Joint J; 2015 May; 97-B(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 25922452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Radiologic evaluation of cup placement variation in conventional total hip arthroplasty]. Leichtle U; Gosselke N; Wirth CJ; Rudert M Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17203443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study. Nodzo SR; Chang CC; Carroll KM; Barlow BT; Banks SA; Padgett DE; Mayman DJ; Jerabek SA Bone Joint J; 2018 Oct; 100-B(10):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 30295538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Digital Radiography in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique and Radiographic Results. Penenberg BL; Samagh SP; Rajaee SS; Woehnl A; Brien WW J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Feb; 100(3):226-235. PubMed ID: 29406344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplasty. Yoon YS; Hodgson AJ; Tonetti J; Masri BA; Duncan CP Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2008 Mar; 23(3):253-9. PubMed ID: 18069102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Three-Dimensional Templating for Acetabular Component Alignment During Total Hip Arthroplasty. Elbuluk AM; Wojack P; Eftekhary N; Vigdorchik JM Orthopedics; 2017 Jul; 40(4):e708-e713. PubMed ID: 28558114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correct Assessment of Acetabular Component Orientation in Total Hip Arthroplasty From Plane Radiographs. Widmer D; Reising K; Kotter E; Helwig P J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2652-2659.e3. PubMed ID: 29615377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach? Rathod PA; Bhalla S; Deshmukh AJ; Rodriguez JA Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1877-85. PubMed ID: 24549773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of the transverse acetabular ligament for acetabular component orientation in total hip replacement: an analysis of acetabular component position and range of movement using navigation software. Kalteis T; Sendtner E; Beverland D; Archbold PA; Hube R; Schuster T; Renkawitz T; Grifka J J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21768623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty? Bingham JS; Spangehl MJ; Hines JT; Taunton MJ; Schwartz AJ J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2927-2931. PubMed ID: 29853308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Image-Less THA Cup Navigation in Clinical Routine Setup: Individual Adjustments, Accuracy, Precision, and Robustness. Zurmühle CA; Zickmantel B; Christen M; Christen B; Zheng G; Schwab JM; Tannast M; Steppacher SD Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Jun; 58(6):. PubMed ID: 35744095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The posterior acetabular wall (PAW): an aid to acetabular orientation at primary THA. Williams HLM; Bartlett GE; Norton MR; Middleton RG Hip Int; 2018 Jan; 28(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 28885650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component. Stiehl JB; Heck DA; Jaramaz B; Amiot LP Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 17487661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterising acetabular component orientation with pelvic motion during total hip arthroplasty. Killen CJ; Murphy MP; Ralles SJ; Khayatzadeh S; Brown NM; Patwardhan AG; Havey RM; Wu K Hip Int; 2021 Nov; 31(6):743-750. PubMed ID: 32375525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]