These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25274912)
1. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up. Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience. Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The S-ROM hydroxyapatite proximally-coated modular femoral stem in revision hip replacement: results of 397 hips at a minimum ten-year follow-up. Imbuldeniya AM; Walter WK; Zicat BA; Walter WL Bone Joint J; 2014 Jun; 96-B(6):730-6. PubMed ID: 24891571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: A Single Surgeon Series Reported at a Minimum of 10 Years Follow-Up. Mehra A; Berryman F; Matharu GS; Pynsent PB; Isbister ES J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1160-6. PubMed ID: 25769743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Poor 10-year survivorship of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Seppänen M; Karvonen M; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A; Liukas A; Mäkelä KT Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):554-559. PubMed ID: 27759474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of hip resurfacing arthroplasty: 6 year results from an international multisurgeon prospective cohort study. Aulakh TS; Jayasekera N; Singh R; Patel A; Roulahamin N; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):197-208. PubMed ID: 26280956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips. Canadian Arthroplasty Society Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimum 5-year follow-up after Cormet hip resurfacing. A single surgeon series of 234 hips. Kordás G; Baxter J; Parsons N; Costa ML; Krikler SJ Hip Int; 2012; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22505179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience. Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The mean ten-year results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1424-1433. PubMed ID: 30418058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]