These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2527492)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of Scotchbond: three-year results.
    Tyas MJ; Burns GA; Byrne PF; Cunningham PJ; Dobson BC; Widdop FT
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Jun; 34(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 2527492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the bond between composite resin and etched glass ionomer cement.
    Tyas MJ; Toohey A; Clark J
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Feb; 34(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 2523216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 2150170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of composite resin and glass ionomer cement restorations in retentive and nonretentive cervical cavity preparations.
    Kaplan I; Mincer HH; Harris EF; Cloyd JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Oct; 68(4):616-23. PubMed ID: 1403938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of three dentine bonding agents.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Dec; 34(6):559-62. PubMed ID: 2533489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized clinical trial of two resin-modified glass ionomer materials: 1-year results.
    Perdigão J; Dutra-Corrêa M; Saraceni SH; Ciaramicoli MT; Kiyan VH
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(6):591-601. PubMed ID: 22770485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials.
    Forss H; Seppä L
    Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Apr; 98(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 2111576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mixed Class V restorations: the potential of a dentine bonding agent.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1990 Oct; 18(5):263-70. PubMed ID: 2150072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite resin restorations: a laboratory study. 1. The influence of glass ionomer cement.
    Smith ED; Martin FE
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 1533112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro marginal leakage of Class II composite resin restorations by thermal cycling.
    Futatsuki M; Nakata M
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1994; 18(3):191-6. PubMed ID: 8054304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in Class V abrasion lesions: a four-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    Dent Mater; 1994 Sep; 10(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 7498593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical performance of dentine bonding agents in the enamel-etched Class V abrasion lesion.
    Tyas MJ
    Aust Dent J; 1990 Oct; 35(5):459-62. PubMed ID: 2073194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.