117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25274958)
1. Comparison of analytical sensitivity and women's interpretation of home pregnancy tests.
Johnson S; Cushion M; Bond S; Godbert S; Pike J
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(3):391-402. PubMed ID: 25274958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of accuracy and certainty of results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter.
Tomlinson C; Marshall J; Ellis JE
Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Jun; 24(6):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18457603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of volunteers' experience of using, and accuracy of reading, different types of home pregnancy test formats.
Pike J; Godbert S; Johnson S
Expert Opin Med Diagn; 2013 Sep; 7(5):435-41. PubMed ID: 23957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The utility of six over-the-counter (home) pregnancy tests.
Cole LA
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 49(8):1317-1322. PubMed ID: 21812725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Home pregnancy tests in the hands of the intended user.
Boxer J; Weddell S; Broomhead D; Hogg C; Johnson S
J Immunoassay Immunochem; 2019; 40(6):642-652. PubMed ID: 31556778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a semi-quantitative pregnancy device for susceptibility to interference caused by hCGβcf.
Nerenz RD; Butch AW; Ashby L; Woldemariam GA; Gronowski AM
Clin Biochem; 2015 Aug; 48(12):815-7. PubMed ID: 25916816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of a home-based device for giving an early estimate of pregnancy duration compared with reference methods.
Johnson SR; Godbert S; Perry P; Parsons P; Roberts L; Buchanan P; Larsen J; Alonzo TA; Zinaman M
Fertil Steril; 2013 Dec; 100(6):1635-41.e1. PubMed ID: 24074759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pathology consultation on human chorionic gonadotropin testing for pregnancy assessment.
Greene DN; Grenache DG;
Am J Clin Pathol; 2015 Dec; 144(6):830-6. PubMed ID: 26572988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of over-the-counter pregnancy tests: comparison of utility and marketing messages.
Cole LA; Sutton-Riley JM; Khanlian SA; Borkovskaya M; Rayburn BB; Rayburn WF
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2005; 45(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 16295647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical sensitivity of four commonly used hCG point of care devices.
Kamer SM; Foley KF; Schmidt RL; Greene DN
Clin Biochem; 2015 Apr; 48(6):448-52. PubMed ID: 25549977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and feasibility of pregnancy home-use tests: laboratory validation and diagnostic evaluation by 638 volunteers.
Daviaud J; Fournet D; Ballongue C; Guillem GP; Leblanc A; Casellas C; Pau B
Clin Chem; 1993 Jan; 39(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8419058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of qualitative urinary hCG assays.
Nickmans S; Vermeersch P; Van Eldere J; Billen J
Acta Clin Belg; 2014 Aug; 69(4):277-9. PubMed ID: 24846178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of urinary chorionic gonadotropin in spontaneous abortion of pre-clinically recognized pregnancy: method development and analytical validation.
Reis MF; Aniceto P; Aguiar P; Simão F; Segurado S
Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 May; 210(3-4):419-27. PubMed ID: 17336148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Home pregnancy test compared to standard-of-care ultrasound dating in the assessment of pregnancy duration.
Johnson S; Shaw R; Parkinson P; Ellis J; Buchanan P; Zinaman M
Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Feb; 27(2):393-401. PubMed ID: 21175374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of home pregnancy tests at the time of missed menses.
Cole LA; Khanlian SA; Sutton JM; Davies S; Rayburn WF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 14749643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a digital ovulation test with three popular line ovulation tests to investigate user accuracy and certainty.
Johnson S; Ellis J; Godbert S; Ali S; Zinaman M
Expert Opin Med Diagn; 2011 Nov; 5(6):467-73. PubMed ID: 23484745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of home pregnancy tests].
Lindhard A; Schmidt L
Ugeskr Laeger; 1993 May; 155(20):1550-3. PubMed ID: 8316987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of low urine specific gravity on pregnancy testing.
Neinstein L; Harvey F
J Am Coll Health; 1998 Nov; 47(3):138-9. PubMed ID: 9830821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performances of urine pregnancy tests on College of American Pathologists Survey specimens.
Biesecker JL; Rippey JH
Am J Clin Pathol; 1981 Oct; 76(4 Suppl):544-6. PubMed ID: 7282640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Background hCG in non-pregnant individuals: need for more sensitive point-of-care and over-the-counter pregnancy tests.
Cole LA; Ladner DG
Clin Biochem; 2009 Feb; 42(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 18929550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
