147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25275269)
21. Effects of different probiotic strains of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium on bacterial translocation and liver injury in an acute liver injury model.
Adawi D; Ahrné S; Molin G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 70(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 11764187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Bile-induced promoters for gene expression in Lactobacillus strains.
Martínez-Fernández JA; Bravo D; Peirotén Á; Arqués JL; Landete JM
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2019 May; 103(9):3819-3827. PubMed ID: 30887172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Probiotic cheese containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® modifies subpopulations of fecal lactobacilli and Clostridium difficile in the elderly.
Lahtinen SJ; Forssten S; Aakko J; Granlund L; Rautonen N; Salminen S; Viitanen M; Ouwehand AC
Age (Dordr); 2012 Feb; 34(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 21264685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Activities of free and encapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 or Lactobacillus casei 01 in processed longan juices on exposure to simulated gastrointestinal tract.
Chaikham P; Apichartsrangkoon A; Worametrachanon S; Supraditareporn W; Chokiatirote E; Van der Wiele T
J Sci Food Agric; 2013 Jul; 93(9):2229-38. PubMed ID: 23401169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lactobacillus species: taxonomic complexity and controversial susceptibilities.
Goldstein EJ; Tyrrell KL; Citron DM
Clin Infect Dis; 2015 May; 60 Suppl 2():S98-107. PubMed ID: 25922408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lactobacillus rhamnosus LA68 and Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 differently influence metabolic and immunological parameters in high fat diet-induced hypercholesterolemia and hepatic steatosis.
Ivanovic N; Minic R; Dimitrijevic L; Radojevic Skodric S; Zivkovic I; Djordjevic B
Food Funct; 2015 Feb; 6(2):558-65. PubMed ID: 25518825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Antimicrobial potential for the combination of bovine lactoferrin or its hydrolysate with lactoferrin-resistant probiotics against foodborne pathogens.
Chen PW; Jheng TT; Shyu CL; Mao FC
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1438-46. PubMed ID: 23332852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effect of
Bonvicini F; Pagnotta E; Punzo A; Calabria D; Simoni P; Mirasoli M; Passerini N; Bertoni S; Ugolini L; Lazzeri L; Gentilomi GA; Caliceti C; Roda A
Nutrients; 2020 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33036498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Probiotic lactobacilli interfere with Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in vitro.
Söderling EM; Marttinen AM; Haukioja AL
Curr Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 62(2):618-22. PubMed ID: 20835828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Differential Effects of Transition Metals on Growth and Metal Uptake for Two Distinct
Huynh U; Qiao M; King J; Trinh B; Valdez J; Haq M; Zastrow ML
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0100621. PubMed ID: 35080431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Probiotic lactobacilli and bacteraemia in Stockholm.
Sullivan A; Nord CE
Scand J Infect Dis; 2006; 38(5):327-31. PubMed ID: 16709533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Antagonistic effects of Streptococcus and Lactobacillus probiotics in pharyngeal biofilms.
Humphreys GJ; McBain AJ
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2019 Apr; 68(4):303-312. PubMed ID: 30776138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of exopolysaccharides, bacteriocins and in vitro and in vivo hypocholesterolemic potential of some Egyptian Lactobacillus spp.
El-Dein AN; Nour El-Deen AM; El-Shatoury EH; Awad GA; Ibrahim MK; Awad HM; Farid MA
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Mar; 173():66-78. PubMed ID: 33482208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The innovative potential of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LR06, Lactobacillus pentosus LPS01, Lactobacillus plantarum LP01, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii Subsp. delbrueckii LDD01 to restore the "gastric barrier effect" in patients chronically treated with PPI: a pilot study.
Del Piano M; Anderloni A; Balzarini M; Ballarè M; Carmagnola S; Montino F; Orsello M; Pagliarulo M; Tari R; Soattini L; Sforza F; Mogna L; Mogna G
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 46 Suppl():S18-26. PubMed ID: 22955351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lactobacillus acidophilus binds to MUC3 component of cultured intestinal epithelial cells with highest affinity.
Das JK; Mahapatra RK; Patro S; Goswami C; Suar M
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2016 Apr; 363(8):. PubMed ID: 26946538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG ATCC53103 and Lactobacillus plantarum JL01 induce cytokine alterations by the production of TCDA, DHA, and succinic and palmitic acids, and enhance immunity of weaned piglets.
Geng T; He F; Su S; Sun K; Zhao L; Zhao Y; Bao N; Pan L; Sun H
Res Vet Sci; 2021 Jul; 137():56-67. PubMed ID: 33932824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus acidophilus suppresses DMH-induced procarcinogenic fecal enzymes and preneoplastic aberrant crypt foci in early colon carcinogenesis in Sprague Dawley rats.
Verma A; Shukla G
Nutr Cancer; 2013; 65(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 23368917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mg
Yang Y; Huang S; Wang J; Jan G; Jeantet R; Chen XD
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Apr; 64(4):283-288. PubMed ID: 28100014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparative study of the effect of probiotics on cariogenic biofilm model for preventing dental caries.
Lee SH; Kim YJ
Arch Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 196(8):601-9. PubMed ID: 24919536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Transcriptomic responses of Caco-2 cells to Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus plantarum J26 against oxidative stress.
Hou Y; Li X; Liu X; Zhang Y; Zhang W; Man C; Jiang Y
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Sep; 102(9):7684-7696. PubMed ID: 31255276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
