159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25276363)
1. Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer.
Meng F; Li Y; Ma H; Yan M; Zhang R
J Thorac Dis; 2014 Sep; 6(9):1218-24. PubMed ID: 25276363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer.
Kinjo Y; Kurita N; Nakamura F; Okabe H; Tanaka E; Kataoka Y; Itami A; Sakai Y; Fukuhara S
Surg Endosc; 2012 Feb; 26(2):381-90. PubMed ID: 21898014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of short-term outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Zhai C; Liu Y; Li W; Xu T; Yang G; Lu H; Hu D
J Thorac Dis; 2015 Dec; 7(12):2352-8. PubMed ID: 26793358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy.
Perry KA; Enestvedt CK; Diggs BS; Jobe BA; Hunter JG
Surg Endosc; 2009 Sep; 23(9):2147-54. PubMed ID: 19116744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Mao T; Fang W; Gu Z; Guo X; Ji C; Chen W
Thorac Cancer; 2015 May; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 26273376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of open three-field and minimally-invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Chen L; Zhao Y
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2011 Mar; 12(3):366-9. PubMed ID: 21186282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma: clinical analysis of 350 cases].
Zhang Z; Song Y; Gao Y; Wang Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 18(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 25656029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy a better alternative to thoracoscopic esophagectomy?
Yao F; Wang J; Yao J; Xu L; Qian J; Cao Y
Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():105-109. PubMed ID: 29061388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nationwide analysis of short-term surgical outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy for malignancy.
Thirunavukarasu P; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Kukar M; Hochwald SN; Nurkin SJ
Int J Surg; 2016 Jan; 25():69-75. PubMed ID: 26602969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Case-matched analysis of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic versus open esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen X; Yang J; Peng J; Jiang H
Int J Clin Exp Med; 2015; 8(8):13516-23. PubMed ID: 26550289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in a single cancer center.
Mu J; Yuan Z; Zhang B; Li N; Lyu F; Mao Y; Xue Q; Gao S; Zhao J; Wang D; Li Z; Gao Y; Zhang L; Huang J; Shao K; Feng F; Zhao L; Li J; Cheng G; Sun K; He J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(4):747-52. PubMed ID: 24534234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy beneficial to elderly patients with esophageal cancer?
Li J; Shen Y; Tan L; Feng M; Wang H; Xi Y; Wang Q
Surg Endosc; 2015 Apr; 29(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 25249141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Could hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy improve the treatment results of esophageal cancer?
Bjelovic M; Babic T; Spica B; Gunjic D; Veselinovic M; Trajkovic G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1196-201. PubMed ID: 27316602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Pham TH; Perry KA; Dolan JP; Schipper P; Sukumar M; Sheppard BC; Hunter JG
Am J Surg; 2010 May; 199(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 20466101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimized total thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Zhou SH; Song YB; Liu LJ; Cui HS
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 14():73. PubMed ID: 26956511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Moon DH; Lee JM; Jeon JH; Yang HC; Kim MS
J Thorac Dis; 2017 Sep; 9(9):3005-3012. PubMed ID: 29221273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laparoscopic assisted versus open gastric pull-up following thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A cohort study.
Daiko H; Fujita T
Int J Surg; 2015 Jul; 19():61-6. PubMed ID: 25986060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of surgical approach on perioperative and long-term outcomes following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ahmadi N; Crnic A; Seely AJ; Sundaresan SR; Villeneuve PJ; Maziak DE; Shamji FM; Gilbert S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1892-1900. PubMed ID: 29067584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y
Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
