147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25276927)
1. Field evaluations of topical arthropod repellents in North, Central, and South America.
Lawrence KL; Achee NL; Bernier UR; Mundal KD; Benante JP
J Med Entomol; 2014 Sep; 51(5):980-8. PubMed ID: 25276927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours.
Carroll JF; Benante JP; Kramer M; Lohmeyer KH; Lawrence K
J Med Entomol; 2010 Jul; 47(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20695288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation of the efficacy of proprietary repellent formulations with IR3535 and picaridin against Aedes aegypti.
Naucke TJ; Kröpke R; Benner G; Schulz J; Wittern KP; Rose A; Kröckel U; Grünewald HW
Parasitol Res; 2007 Jun; 101(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17252270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protective efficacy of menthol propylene glycol carbonate compared to N, N-diethyl-methylbenzamide against mosquito bites in Northern Tanzania.
Kweka EJ; Munga S; Mahande AM; Msangi S; Mazigo HD; Adrias AQ; Matias JR
Parasit Vectors; 2012 Sep; 5():189. PubMed ID: 22950604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemical and Plant-Based Insect Repellents: Efficacy, Safety, and Toxicity.
Diaz JH
Wilderness Environ Med; 2016 Mar; 27(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 26827259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Generic insect repellent detector from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.
Syed Z; Pelletier J; Flounders E; Chitolina RF; Leal WS
PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e17705. PubMed ID: 21436880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites.
Fradin MS; Day JF
N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia.
Frances SP; Van Dung N; Beebe NW; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2002 May; 39(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 12061453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus.
Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of picaridin repellents reveals differences in repellent sensitivity between Southeast Asian vectors of malaria and arboviruses.
Van Roey K; Sokny M; Denis L; Van den Broeck N; Heng S; Siv S; Sluydts V; Sochantha T; Coosemans M; Durnez L
PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2014 Dec; 8(12):e3326. PubMed ID: 25522134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory evaluation of citronella, picaridin, and deet repellents against Psorophora ciliata and Psorophora howardii.
Scott JM; Hossain T; Davidson C; Smith ML; Xue RD
J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2014 Jun; 30(2):136-7. PubMed ID: 25102599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurophysiological and behavioral responses of gypsy moth larvae to insect repellents: DEET, IR3535, and picaridin.
Sanford JL; Barski SA; Seen CM; Dickens JC; Shields VD
PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99924. PubMed ID: 24955823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insecticidal and Behavioral Avoidance Responses of Anopheles minimus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Three Synthetic Repellents.
Boonyuan W; Sathantriphop S; Tainchum K; Muenworn V; Prabaripai A; Bangs MJ; Chareonviriyaphap T
J Med Entomol; 2017 Sep; 54(5):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 28419272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insect repellents.
Med Lett Drugs Ther; 2021 Jul; 63(1628):108-112. PubMed ID: 34543260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mosquito repellents for the traveller: does picaridin provide longer protection than DEET?
Goodyer L; Schofield S
J Travel Med; 2018 May; 25(suppl_1):S10-S15. PubMed ID: 29718433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and picaridin against mosquitoes in Northern Territory, Australia.
Frances SP; Waterson DG; Beebe NW; Cooper RD
J Med Entomol; 2004 May; 41(3):414-7. PubMed ID: 15185943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insect repellents: historical perspectives and new developments.
Katz TM; Miller JH; Hebert AA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 May; 58(5):865-71. PubMed ID: 18272250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Susceptibility of Dermacentor reticulatus tick to repellents containing different active ingrediens.
Gliniewicz A; Borecka A; Przygodzka M; Mikulak E
Przegl Epidemiol; 2019; 73(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 31134780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a Novel User-Friendly Arthropod Repellent Gel, Verdegen.
Chauhan KR; McPhatter LP; O'Dell K; Syed Z; Wheeler A; Debboun M
J Med Entomol; 2021 Nov; 58(6):2479-2483. PubMed ID: 33855440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes.
Costantini C; Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Nov; 98(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 15363644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
