These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25276927)
1. Field evaluations of topical arthropod repellents in North, Central, and South America. Lawrence KL; Achee NL; Bernier UR; Mundal KD; Benante JP J Med Entomol; 2014 Sep; 51(5):980-8. PubMed ID: 25276927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Formulations of deet, picaridin, and IR3535 applied to skin repel nymphs of the lone star tick (Acari: Ixodidae) for 12 hours. Carroll JF; Benante JP; Kramer M; Lohmeyer KH; Lawrence K J Med Entomol; 2010 Jul; 47(4):699-704. PubMed ID: 20695288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation of the efficacy of proprietary repellent formulations with IR3535 and picaridin against Aedes aegypti. Naucke TJ; Kröpke R; Benner G; Schulz J; Wittern KP; Rose A; Kröckel U; Grünewald HW Parasitol Res; 2007 Jun; 101(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17252270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Protective efficacy of menthol propylene glycol carbonate compared to N, N-diethyl-methylbenzamide against mosquito bites in Northern Tanzania. Kweka EJ; Munga S; Mahande AM; Msangi S; Mazigo HD; Adrias AQ; Matias JR Parasit Vectors; 2012 Sep; 5():189. PubMed ID: 22950604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Chemical and Plant-Based Insect Repellents: Efficacy, Safety, and Toxicity. Diaz JH Wilderness Environ Med; 2016 Mar; 27(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 26827259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites. Fradin MS; Day JF N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Field evaluation of repellent formulations against daytime and nighttime biting mosquitoes in a tropical rainforest in northern Australia. Frances SP; Van Dung N; Beebe NW; Debboun M J Med Entomol; 2002 May; 39(3):541-4. PubMed ID: 12061453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative efficacy of IR3535 and deet as repellents against adult Aedes aegypti and Culex quinquefasciatus. Cilek JE; Petersen JL; Hallmon CE J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2004 Sep; 20(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 15532931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field evaluation of picaridin repellents reveals differences in repellent sensitivity between Southeast Asian vectors of malaria and arboviruses. Van Roey K; Sokny M; Denis L; Van den Broeck N; Heng S; Siv S; Sluydts V; Sochantha T; Coosemans M; Durnez L PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2014 Dec; 8(12):e3326. PubMed ID: 25522134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laboratory evaluation of citronella, picaridin, and deet repellents against Psorophora ciliata and Psorophora howardii. Scott JM; Hossain T; Davidson C; Smith ML; Xue RD J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2014 Jun; 30(2):136-7. PubMed ID: 25102599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Neurophysiological and behavioral responses of gypsy moth larvae to insect repellents: DEET, IR3535, and picaridin. Sanford JL; Barski SA; Seen CM; Dickens JC; Shields VD PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e99924. PubMed ID: 24955823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insecticidal and Behavioral Avoidance Responses of Anopheles minimus and Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Three Synthetic Repellents. Boonyuan W; Sathantriphop S; Tainchum K; Muenworn V; Prabaripai A; Bangs MJ; Chareonviriyaphap T J Med Entomol; 2017 Sep; 54(5):1312-1322. PubMed ID: 28419272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insect repellents. Med Lett Drugs Ther; 2021 Jul; 63(1628):108-112. PubMed ID: 34543260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mosquito repellents for the traveller: does picaridin provide longer protection than DEET? Goodyer L; Schofield S J Travel Med; 2018 May; 25(suppl_1):S10-S15. PubMed ID: 29718433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field evaluation of repellent formulations containing deet and picaridin against mosquitoes in Northern Territory, Australia. Frances SP; Waterson DG; Beebe NW; Cooper RD J Med Entomol; 2004 May; 41(3):414-7. PubMed ID: 15185943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Insect repellents: historical perspectives and new developments. Katz TM; Miller JH; Hebert AA J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 May; 58(5):865-71. PubMed ID: 18272250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Susceptibility of Dermacentor reticulatus tick to repellents containing different active ingrediens. Gliniewicz A; Borecka A; Przygodzka M; Mikulak E Przegl Epidemiol; 2019; 73(1):117-125. PubMed ID: 31134780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a Novel User-Friendly Arthropod Repellent Gel, Verdegen. Chauhan KR; McPhatter LP; O'Dell K; Syed Z; Wheeler A; Debboun M J Med Entomol; 2021 Nov; 58(6):2479-2483. PubMed ID: 33855440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field evaluation of the efficacy and persistence of insect repellents DEET, IR3535, and KBR 3023 against Anopheles gambiae complex and other Afrotropical vector mosquitoes. Costantini C; Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2004 Nov; 98(11):644-52. PubMed ID: 15363644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]