These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25277014)

  • 1. Effects of intelligent advanced warnings on drivers negotiating the dilemma zone.
    Gugerty L; McIntyre SE; Link D; Zimmerman K; Tolani D; Huang P; Pokorny RA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1021-35. PubMed ID: 25277014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Heavy-truck drivers' following behavior with intervention of an integrated, in-vehicle crash warning system: a field evaluation.
    Bao S; LeBlanc DJ; Sayer JR; Flannagan C
    Hum Factors; 2012 Oct; 54(5):687-97. PubMed ID: 23156615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to present collision warnings at intersections?--a comparison of different approaches.
    Werneke J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 52():91-9. PubMed ID: 23305968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of audio in-vehicle red light-running warning message on driving behavior based on a driving simulator experiment.
    Yan X; Liu Y; Xu Y
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 24697409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Innovative countermeasures for red light running prevention at signalized intersections: A driving simulator study.
    Hussain Q; Alhajyaseen WKM; Brijs K; Pirdavani A; Brijs T
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jan; 134():105349. PubMed ID: 31707167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.
    Scott JJ; Gray R
    Hum Factors; 2008 Apr; 50(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 18516837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of proposed countermeasures for dilemma zone at signalized intersections based on cellular automata simulations.
    Wu Y; Abdel-Aty M; Ding Y; Jia B; Shi Q; Yan X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():69-78. PubMed ID: 28911878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Volvo drivers' experiences with advanced crash avoidance and related technologies.
    Eichelberger AH; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 24345022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of an integrated collision warning system on teenage driver behavior.
    Jermakian JS; Bao S; Buonarosa ML; Sayer JR; Farmer CM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():65-75. PubMed ID: 28454872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation into the effect of an intersection crash warning system on driving performance in a simulator.
    Chen H; Cao L; Logan DB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):529-37. PubMed ID: 21972864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomous emergency braking systems adapted to snowy road conditions improve drivers' perceived safety and trust.
    Koglbauer I; Holzinger J; Eichberger A; Lex C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):332-337. PubMed ID: 29227692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.
    Winkler S; Kazazi J; Vollrath M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():398-409. PubMed ID: 29477461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of emergency vehicles: driver responses to advance warning in a driving simulator.
    Lenné MG; Triggs TJ; Mulvihill CM; Regan MA; Corben BF
    Hum Factors; 2008 Feb; 50(1):135-44. PubMed ID: 18354977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual advisory warnings about hidden dangers: Effects of specific symbols and spatial referencing on necessary and unnecessary warnings.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Oct; 72():25-36. PubMed ID: 29885725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Augmented reality warnings in vehicles: Effects of modality and specificity on effectiveness.
    Schwarz F; Fastenmeier W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():55-66. PubMed ID: 28189059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of lane departure warnings onset and reliability on car drivers' behaviors.
    Navarro J; Deniel J; Yousfi E; Jallais C; Bueno M; Fort A
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):123-131. PubMed ID: 27890120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.
    Lee JD; McGehee DV; Brown TL; Reyes ML
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(2):314-34. PubMed ID: 12452276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
    Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forward collision warning based on a driver model to increase drivers' acceptance.
    Puente Guillen P; Gohl I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S21-S26. PubMed ID: 31381428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.