BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25277745)

  • 1. Comparison of Etests and Vitek 2 ® to broth microdilution for the susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans.
    Mahabeer Y; Chang CC; Naidu D; Dorasamy A; Lewin S; Ndung'u T; Moosa MY; French M; Mlisana K; Coovadia Y
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2014 Dec; 80(4):294-8. PubMed ID: 25277745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative antifungal susceptibility analyses of Cryptococcus neoformans VNI and Cryptococcus gattii VGII from the Brazilian Amazon Region by the Etest, Vitek 2, and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods.
    Nishikawa MM; Almeida-Paes R; Brito-Santos F; Nascimento CR; Fialho MM; Trilles L; Morales BP; da Silva SA; Santos W; Santos LO; Fortes ST; Cardarelli-Leite P; Lázera MDS
    Med Mycol; 2019 Oct; 57(7):864-873. PubMed ID: 30657975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of Sensititre YeastOne and VITEK 2 against the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-E4 reference broth microdilution method for the antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii.
    Zhang M; Zhou Z; Wang D; Zhou A; Song G; Chen X; Guo J; Wu W
    Med Mycol; 2022 Mar; 60(3):. PubMed ID: 35099022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of the Vitek 2 antifungal susceptibility system and E-test with the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Indian clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans.
    Tewari A; Behera B; Mathur P; Xess I
    Mycopathologia; 2012 Jun; 173(5-6):427-33. PubMed ID: 22354778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Susceptibility profile and epidemiological cut-off values of Cryptococcus neoformans species complex from Argentina.
    Córdoba S; Isla MG; Szusz W; Vivot W; Altamirano R; Davel G
    Mycoses; 2016 Jun; 59(6):351-6. PubMed ID: 26865081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro antifungal activities of amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, fluconazole and itraconazole against Cryptococcus neoformans isolated from cerebrospinal fluid and blood from patients in Serbia.
    Trpković A; Pekmezović M; Barać A; Crnčević Radović L; Arsić Arsenijević V
    J Mycol Med; 2012 Sep; 22(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 23518082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-centre evaluation of the Etest method for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans. BSAC Working Party on Antifungal Chemotherapy.
    Warnock DW; Johnson EM; Rogers TR
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 1998 Sep; 42(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 9786472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Etest and microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to four antifungal agents.
    Aller AI; Martín-Mazuelos E; Gutiérrez MJ; Bernal S; Chávez M; Recio FJ
    J Antimicrob Chemother; 2000 Dec; 46(6):997-1000. PubMed ID: 11102421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Results obtained with various antifungal susceptibility testing methods do not predict early clinical outcome in patients with cryptococcosis.
    Dannaoui E; Abdul M; Arpin M; Michel-Nguyen A; Piens MA; Favel A; Lortholary O; Dromer F;
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2006 Jul; 50(7):2464-70. PubMed ID: 16801427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the VITEK 2 system to test the susceptibility of Candida spp., Trichosporon asahii and Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole and voriconazole: a comparison with the M27-A3 reference method.
    Cejudo MA; Gallego AG; Lacasa EC; Aller AI; Romero A; García JP; Andrés GQ; Martín-Mazuelos E
    Med Mycol; 2010 Aug; 48(5):710-9. PubMed ID: 20109092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decreasing fluconazole susceptibility of clinical South African Cryptococcus neoformans isolates over a decade.
    Naicker SD; Mpembe RS; Maphanga TG; Zulu TG; Desanto D; Wadula J; Mvelase N; Maluleka C; Reddy K; Dawood H; Maloba M; Govender NP;
    PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2020 Mar; 14(3):e0008137. PubMed ID: 32231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of Etest and Neo-Sensitabs diffusion assays on Mueller-Hinton-methylene blue agar with broth microdilution reference method (CLSI-M27-A2) for testing susceptibilities of Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B and fluconazole.
    Ochiuzzi ME; Santiso GM; Arechavala AI
    Med Mycol; 2010 Sep; 48(6):893-6. PubMed ID: 20370370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Molecular epidemiology and in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of 108 clinical Cryptococcus neoformans sensu lato and Cryptococcus gattii sensu lato isolates from Denmark.
    Hagen F; Hare Jensen R; Meis JF; Arendrup MC
    Mycoses; 2016 Sep; 59(9):576-84. PubMed ID: 27061834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro susceptibility of Cryptococcus neoformans clinical isolates from Egypt to seven antifungal drugs.
    Abdel-Salam HA
    Mycoses; 2005 Sep; 48(5):327-32. PubMed ID: 16115103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative evaluation of the Vitek 2 yeast susceptibility test and CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing antifungal susceptibility of invasive fungal isolates in Italy: the GISIA3 study.
    Borghi E; Iatta R; Sciota R; Biassoni C; Cuna T; Montagna MT; Morace G
    J Clin Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 48(9):3153-7. PubMed ID: 20631105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of antifungal combination against Cryptococcus spp.
    Reichert-Lima F; Busso-Lopes AF; Lyra L; Peron IH; Taguchi H; Mikami Y; Kamei K; Moretti ML; Schreiber AZ
    Mycoses; 2016 Sep; 59(9):585-93. PubMed ID: 27135278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cryptococcus neoformans and C. gattii isolates from both HIV-infected and uninfected patients: antifungal susceptibility and outcome of cryptococcal disease.
    Nascimento E; Vitali LH; Kress MRVZ; Martinez R
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2017; 59():e49. PubMed ID: 28793019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptation to Fluconazole via Aneuploidy Enables Cross-Adaptation to Amphotericin B and Flucytosine in Cryptococcus neoformans.
    Yang F; Gritsenko V; Lu H; Zhen C; Gao L; Berman J; Jiang YY
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0072321. PubMed ID: 34585947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of Neo-Sensitabs tablet diffusion assay results on three different agar media with CLSI broth microdilution M27-A2 and disk diffusion M44-A results for testing susceptibilities of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans to amphotericin B, caspofungin, fluconazole, itraconazole, and voriconazole.
    Espinel-Ingroff A; Canton E; Gibbs D; Wang A
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 45(3):858-64. PubMed ID: 17215342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Antifungal susceptibilities of clinical and environmental isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans in Goiânia city, Goiás, Brazil.
    Souza LK; Fernandes Ode F; Kobayashi CC; Passos XS; Costa CR; Lemos JA; Souza-Júnior AH; Silva Mdo R
    Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 2005; 47(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 16302107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.