These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat. Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability. Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How components of facial width to height ratio differently contribute to the perception of social traits. Costa M; Lio G; Gomez A; Sirigu A PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172739. PubMed ID: 28235081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body mass index, facial width-to-height ratio, and perceived formidability in female Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) fighters. Palmer-Hague JL; Twele AC; Fuller AJ Aggress Behav; 2018 Nov; 44(6):553-560. PubMed ID: 29956344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness. Summersby S; Harris B; Denson TF; White D R Soc Open Sci; 2022 May; 9(5):211500. PubMed ID: 35592758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of income and testosterone on the validity of facial width-to-height ratio as a biomarker for dominance. Noser E; Schoch J; Ehlert U PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0207333. PubMed ID: 30412629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Social status moderates the relationship between facial structure and aggression. Goetz SM; Shattuck KS; Miller RM; Campbell JA; Lozoya E; Weisfeld GE; Carré JM Psychol Sci; 2013 Nov; 24(11):2329-34. PubMed ID: 24068116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating aggression from emotionally neutral faces: which facial cues are diagnostic? Carré JM; Morrissey MD; Mondloch CJ; McCormick CM Perception; 2010; 39(3):356-77. PubMed ID: 20465172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Further evidence for links between facial width-to-height ratio and fighting success: Commentary on Zilioli et al. (2014). Třebický V; Fialová J; Kleisner K; Roberts SC; Little AC; Havlíček J Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 25236530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facing humanness: Facial width-to-height ratio predicts ascriptions of humanity. Deska JC; Lloyd EP; Hugenberg K J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Jan; 114(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 28846003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The facial width-to-height ratio determines interpersonal distance preferences in the observer. Lieberz KA; Windmann S; Geniole SN; McCormick CM; Mueller-Engelmann M; Gruener F; Bornefeld-Ettmann P; Steil R Aggress Behav; 2017 Sep; 43(5):460-470. PubMed ID: 28261811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces. Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Let me guess how old you are: effects of age, gender, and facial expression on perceptions of age. Voelkle MC; Ebner NC; Lindenberger U; Riediger M Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):265-77. PubMed ID: 21895379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Facial structure is indicative of explicit support for prejudicial beliefs. Hehman E; Leitner JB; Deegan MP; Gaertner SL Psychol Sci; 2013 Mar; 24(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 23389425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not. Lefevre CE; Etchells PJ; Howell EC; Clark AP; Penton-Voak IS Biol Lett; 2014 Oct; 10(10):20140729. PubMed ID: 25339656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]