These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25279368)

  • 1. Antipodal biosecurity? Oversight of dual use research in the United States and australia.
    Smith FL; Kamradt-Scott A
    Front Public Health; 2014; 2():142. PubMed ID: 25279368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving Biosecurity in Pakistan: Current Efforts, Challenges, and Recommendations on a Multidimensional Management Strategy.
    Khan T; Tanveer F; Muhammad J
    Health Secur; 2021; 19(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 33956522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biosecurity. Will flu papers lead to new research oversight?
    Enserink M; Malakoff D
    Science; 2012 Jan; 335(6064):20, 22. PubMed ID: 22223781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Law in the time of anthrax: biosecurity lessons from the United States.
    Enemark C
    J Law Med; 2010 May; 17(5):748-60. PubMed ID: 20552938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biosecurity and the review and publication of dual-use research of concern.
    Patrone D; Resnik D; Chin L
    Biosecur Bioterror; 2012 Sep; 10(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 22871221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dairy goat producers' understanding, knowledge and attitudes towards biosecurity and Q-fever in Australia.
    Gunther MJ; Heller J; Hayes L; Hernandez-Jover M
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Oct; 170():104742. PubMed ID: 31421494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biosafety and biosecurity as essential pillars of international health security and cross-cutting elements of biological nonproliferation.
    Bakanidze L; Imnadze P; Perkins D
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Dec; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S12. PubMed ID: 21143822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The dual use of research ethics committees: why professional self-governance falls short in preserving biosecurity.
    Salloch S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):53. PubMed ID: 29871633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Knowledge and attitudes of Australian livestock producers concerning biosecurity practices.
    Paquette CC; Schemann KA; Ward MP
    Aust Vet J; 2020 Nov; 98(11):533-545. PubMed ID: 32754999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the vulnerability of beef producers in Australia to an FMD outbreak using a Bayesian Network predictive model.
    Manyweathers J; Maru Y; Hayes L; Loechel B; Kruger H; Mankad A; Xie G; Woodgate R; Hernandez-Jover M
    Prev Vet Med; 2020 Feb; 175():104872. PubMed ID: 31981953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey of Australian equine veterinarians evaluating their biosecurity training and perceptions and opinions about the management of the 2007 equine influenza outbreak.
    Schemann K; Toribio JA; Taylor MR; Ward MP; Dhand NK
    Aust Vet J; 2014 Apr; 92(4):93-100. PubMed ID: 24673133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biosafety Oversight and Compliance: What do you Mean, I have to Fill Out Another Form?!
    Petrella BL
    Curr Protoc Microbiol; 2015 Nov; 39():1A.5.1-1A.5.16. PubMed ID: 26528783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-farm characteristics and biosecurity protocols for small-scale swine producers in eastern Australia.
    Schembri N; Hernandez-Jover M; Toribio JA; Holyoake PK
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jan; 118(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 25433716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Public awareness, acceptability and risk perception about infectious diseases dual-use research of concern: a cross-sectional survey.
    MacIntyre CR; Adam DC; Turner R; Chughtai AA; Engells T
    BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e029134. PubMed ID: 31911509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Critical Analysis of the Scientific and Commercial Rationales for the
    Koblentz GD
    mSphere; 2018; 3(2):. PubMed ID: 29569633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Horse owners' biosecurity practices following the first equine influenza outbreak in Australia.
    Schemann K; Taylor MR; Toribio JA; Dhand NK
    Prev Vet Med; 2011 Dec; 102(4):304-14. PubMed ID: 21893356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Horse owners'/managers' perceptions about effectiveness of biosecurity measures based on their experiences during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak in Australia.
    Schemann K; Firestone SM; Taylor MR; Toribio JA; Ward MP; Dhand NK
    Prev Vet Med; 2012 Sep; 106(2):97-107. PubMed ID: 22326045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Australian horse owners and their biosecurity practices in the context of Hendra virus.
    Wiethoelter AK; Schembri N; Dhand NK; Sawford K; Taylor MR; Moloney B; Wright T; Kung N; Field HE; Toribio JLML
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Dec; 148():28-36. PubMed ID: 29157371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding animal health communication networks among smallholder livestock producers in Australia using stakeholder analysis.
    Hayes L; Woodgate R; Rast L; Toribio JLML; Hernández-Jover M
    Prev Vet Med; 2017 Sep; 144():89-101. PubMed ID: 28716209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biosecurity and the management of emergency animal disease among commercial beef producers in New South Wales and Queensland (Australia).
    Hernández-Jover M; Higgins V; Bryant M; Rast L; McShane C
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Nov; 134():92-102. PubMed ID: 27836050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.