130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2527956)
1. Binocular depth from surfaces versus volumes.
Brookes A; Stevens KA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):479-84. PubMed ID: 2527956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How is motion disparity integrated with binocular disparity in depth perception?
Ichikawa M; Saida S
Percept Psychophys; 1996 Feb; 58(2):271-82. PubMed ID: 8838169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning to see random-dot stereograms.
O'Toole AJ; Kersten DJ
Perception; 1992; 21(2):227-43. PubMed ID: 1513672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Depth inversion despite stereopsis: the appearance of random-dot stereograms on surfaces seen in reverse perspective.
Yellott JI; Kaiwi JL
Perception; 1979; 8(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 471677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distortions of distance and shape are not produced by a single continuous transformation of reach space.
Bingham GP; Crowell JA; Todd JT
Percept Psychophys; 2004 Jan; 66(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 15095948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monocular stereopsis with and without head movement.
Ono H; Steinbach MJ
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 2385492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Localization of monocular stimuli in different depth planes.
Shimono K; Tam WJ; Asakura N; Ohmi M
Vision Res; 2005 Sep; 45(20):2631-41. PubMed ID: 16005487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Depth cues, rather than perceived depth, govern vergence.
Wismeijer DA; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ
Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 17717656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judgments by monkeys of apparent depth in dynamic random-dot stereograms.
Crawford ML; von Noorden GK; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
Behav Brain Res; 1996 Sep; 79(1-2):219-25. PubMed ID: 8883833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of monocular regions in stereoscopic displays.
Gillam B; Borsting E
Perception; 1988; 17(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 3249668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceived depth inversion of smoothly curved surfaces due to image orientation.
Reichel FD; Todd JT
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):653-64. PubMed ID: 2144578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stereo transparency in ambiguous stereograms generated by overlapping two identical dot patterns.
Watanabe O
J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):24.1-9. PubMed ID: 20053115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures?
Harris JP
Am J Psychol; 1980 Sep; 93(3):445-57. PubMed ID: 7212126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The dynamics of the visual system in combining conflicting KDE and binocular stereopsis cues.
Uomori K; Nishida S
Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):526-36. PubMed ID: 8008554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planar motion permits perception of metric structure in stereopsis.
Lappin JS; Love SR
Percept Psychophys; 1992 Jan; 51(1):86-102. PubMed ID: 1549428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pseudoscopic viewing: transfer and persistence of reversed depth relations from the viewing of photographs to the real scene.
Kalaugher PG
Perception; 1987; 16(3):359-74. PubMed ID: 3432031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion.
Tittle JS; Braunstein ML
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Aug; 54(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 8361830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure from stereo by associative learning of the constraints.
O'Toole AJ
Perception; 1989; 18(6):767-82. PubMed ID: 2628927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Focused attention in three-dimensional space.
Andersen GJ
Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 2304809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Static depth cues do affect the perceived direction of motion.
Mowafy L
Perception; 1990; 19(5):595-609. PubMed ID: 2102994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
