These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2527957)
1. Binocular rivalry and dichoptic masking: suppressed stimuli do not mask stimuli in a dominating eye. Westendorf DH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Aug; 15(3):485-92. PubMed ID: 2527957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry share common perceptual dynamics. van Boxtel JJ; van Ee R; Erkelens CJ J Vis; 2007 Nov; 7(14):3.1-11. PubMed ID: 18217798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants. Brown RJ; Candy TR; Norcia AM Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 40(13):3324-33. PubMed ID: 10586959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A binocular site for contrast-modulated masking. Harris JM; Willis A Vision Res; 2001 Mar; 41(7):873-81. PubMed ID: 11248273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dichoptic visual masking reveals that early binocular neurons exhibit weak interocular suppression: implications for binocular vision and visual awareness. Macknik SL; Martinez-Conde S J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(6):1049-59. PubMed ID: 15298791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance under dichoptic versus binocular viewing conditions: effects of attention and task requirements. Kimchi R; Gopher D; Rubin Y; Raij D Hum Factors; 1993 Mar; 35(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 8509105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of ayahuasca on binocular rivalry with dichoptic stimulus alternation. Frecska E; White KD; Luna LE Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2004 Apr; 173(1-2):79-87. PubMed ID: 14712339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Nguyen VA; Freeman AW; Wenderoth P Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):348-60. PubMed ID: 11281109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monocular rivalry exhibits three hallmarks of binocular rivalry: evidence for common processes. O'Shea RP; Parker A; La Rooy D; Alais D Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):671-81. PubMed ID: 19232529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dichoptic and physical information combination: a comparison. Uttal WR; Baruch T; Allen L Perception; 1995; 24(4):351-62. PubMed ID: 7675616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Baker DH; Graf EW Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 19124036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry. Su YR; He ZJ; Ooi TL Vision Res; 2011 Jun; 51(11):1288-96. PubMed ID: 21496462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries. van Boxtel JJ; Knapen T; Erkelens CJ; van Ee R J Vis; 2008 Nov; 8(15):13.1-17. PubMed ID: 19146297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of temporal suppression mechanism in binocular rivalry. Sohmiya T; Sohmiya K Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Jun; 60(3):995-8. PubMed ID: 4022745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Binocular contrast interactions: dichoptic masking is not a single process. Baker DH; Meese TS Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3096-107. PubMed ID: 17904610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]