124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25280292)
1. Re: prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.
Assimos DG
J Urol; 2014 Jun; 191(6):1812-3. PubMed ID: 25280292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: Impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Sener NC; Imamoglu A; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug G; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H
Urolithiasis; 2014 Dec; 42(6):559. PubMed ID: 25113392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of pelvicalyceal anatomy in treatment with shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy of lower pole renal stones.
Adanur S; Ziypak T
Urolithiasis; 2014 Aug; 42(4):373. PubMed ID: 24840300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A Prospective Randomized Comparison Between Shock Wave Lithotripsy and Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Caliceal Stones ≤2 cm: A Single-Center Experience.
Kumar A; Vasudeva P; Nanda B; Kumar N; Das MK; Jha SK
J Endourol; 2015 May; 29(5):575-9. PubMed ID: 25203489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
El-Nahas AR; Ibrahim HM; Youssef RF; Sheir KZ
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 22372915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi.
Hollenbeck BK; Schuster TG; Faerber GJ; Wolf JS
Urology; 2001 Dec; 58(6):859-63. PubMed ID: 11744445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones smaller than 1 cm.
Sener NC; Imamoglu MA; Bas O; Ozturk U; Goktug HN; Tuygun C; Bakirtas H
Urolithiasis; 2014 Apr; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 24220692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management options for lower pole renal calculi.
Raman JD; Pearle MS
Curr Opin Urol; 2008 Mar; 18(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18303547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Commentary on shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi.
Schenkman NS
J Urol; 2008 May; 179(5 Suppl):S74. PubMed ID: 18405760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Sener et al.: asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial (Urology 2015;85:33-37).
Karatag T; Buldu I; Istanbulluoglu MO
Urology; 2015 Mar; 85(3):709. PubMed ID: 25733297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureterorenoscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotripsy on moderate size renal pelvis stones.
Bas O; Bakirtas H; Sener NC; Ozturk U; Tuygun C; Goktug HN; Imamoglu MA
Urolithiasis; 2014 Apr; 42(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 24162954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Asymptomatic lower pole small renal stones: shock wave lithotripsy, flexible ureteroscopy, or observation? A prospective randomized trial.
Sener NC; Bas O; Sener E; Zengin K; Ozturk U; Altunkol A; Evliyaoglu Y
Urology; 2015 Jan; 85(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 25440816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of combining flexible and rigid ureteroscopy for transurethral lithotripsy.
Shigemura K; Yasufuku T; Yamashita M; Arakawa S; Fujisawa M
Kobe J Med Sci; 2010 Aug; 56(1):E24-8. PubMed ID: 21063143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.
Freton L; Peyronnet B; Arnaud A; Tondut L; Hascoet J; Pradère B; Verhoest G; Habonimana É; Azzis O; Fremond B; Bensalah K
J Endourol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 27824261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tailored minimally invasive management of complex calculi in horseshoe kidney.
Ding J; Zhang Y; Cao Q; Huang T; Xu W; Huang K; Fang J; Bai Q; Qi J; Huang Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(5):601-10. PubMed ID: 26409427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Trade-off Between Invasiveness and Efficacy: Ureteroscopy vs Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Commentary on: Comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
Shakeri A; Van Asseldonk B; Elterman DS
Urology; 2015 Nov; 86(5):850-1. PubMed ID: 26375846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.
Resorlu B; Unsal A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2):E5. PubMed ID: 22734479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Re: comparative effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treating patients with kidney stones.
Denstedt J; Welk B
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):540. PubMed ID: 26282357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Endoscopic techniques in the treatment of calculi in the upper urinary tract].
Hem E
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1996 Oct; 116(24):2893-6. PubMed ID: 8975406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lower-pole stones: do we finally have more answers than questions?
Patterson JM; Rukin NJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):617-8. PubMed ID: 25435265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
