263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25280476)
1. Automated breast ultrasound system (ABUS): reproducibility of mass localization, size measurement, and characterization on serial examinations.
Chang JM; Cha JH; Park JS; Kim SJ; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2015 Oct; 56(10):1163-70. PubMed ID: 25280476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.
Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Park JH; Lee KE; Kim JH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):747-54. PubMed ID: 21862820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic performance of automated breast ultrasound as a replacement for a hand-held second-look ultrasound for breast lesions detected initially on magnetic resonance imaging.
Chae EY; Shin HJ; Kim HJ; Yoo H; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim HH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2246-54. PubMed ID: 24035627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deformable mapping technique to correlate lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis and automated breast ultrasound images.
Green CA; Goodsitt MM; Brock KK; Davis CL; Larson ED; Lau JH; Carson PL
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4402-4417. PubMed ID: 30066340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of Automated Breast Ultrasonography and Handheld Ultrasonography for Breast Lesion Size Measurement.
Park KW; Ko EY; Park S; Han BK; Ko ES; Choi JS; Kwon MR
Ultrasound Q; 2022 Jan; 38(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 35001027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re-evaluation of high-risk breast mammography lesions by target ultrasound and ABUS of breast non-mass-like lesions.
Zhang J; Cai L; Chen L; Pang X; Chen M; Yan D; Liu J; Luo L
BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Oct; 21(1):156. PubMed ID: 34702200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast cancers initially detected by hand-held ultrasound: detection performance of radiologists using automated breast ultrasound data.
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21498319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization.
Berg WA; Blume JD; Cormack JB; Mendelson EB
Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):355-65. PubMed ID: 17057064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Whole Breast Ultrasound: Comparison of the Visibility of Suspicious Lesions with Automated Breast Volumetric Scanning Versus Hand-Held Breast Ultrasound.
Kuzmiak CM; Ko EY; Tuttle LA; Steed D; Zeng D; Yoon SC
Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):870-9. PubMed ID: 25872862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.
van Zelst JCM; Tan T; Clauser P; Domingo A; Dorrius MD; Drieling D; Golatta M; Gras F; de Jong M; Pijnappel R; Rutten MJCM; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2996-3006. PubMed ID: 29417251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images.
Moon WK; Shen YW; Huang CS; Chiang LR; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 37(4):539-48. PubMed ID: 21420580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 3D-Automated Breast Ultrasound With Handheld Breast Ultrasound Regarding Detection and BI-RADS Characterization of Lesions in Dense Breasts: A Study of 592 Cases.
Güldogan N; Yılmaz E; Arslan A; Küçükkaya F; Atila N; Arıbal E
Acad Radiol; 2022 Aug; 29(8):1143-1148. PubMed ID: 34955365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Automated breast ultrasound vs. handheld ultrasound: BI-RADS classification, duration of the examination and patient comfort].
Prosch H; Halbwachs C; Strobl C; Reisner LM; Hondl M; Weber M; Mostbeck GH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Oct; 32(5):504-10. PubMed ID: 21630181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of Return to Routine Screening for BI-RADS 3 Lesions Detected at Supplemental Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: A Prospective Study.
Barr RG; DeSivestri A; Golatta M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Dec; 217(6):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 34259039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
