These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25280985)
1. Reward breaks through the inhibitory region around attentional focus. Wang L; Duan Y; Theeuwes J; Zhou X J Vis; 2014 Oct; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 25280985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stimuli that signal the availability of reward break into attentional focus. Wang L; Li S; Zhou X; Theeuwes J Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():20-28. PubMed ID: 29408161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture. Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula. Wang L; Yu H; Hu J; Theeuwes J; Gong X; Xiang Y; Jiang C; Zhou X Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Dec; 36(12):5233-51. PubMed ID: 26416017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the spatial interaction of visual working memory and attention: evidence for a global effect from memory-guided saccades. Herwig A; Beisert M; Schneider WX J Vis; 2010 May; 10(5):8. PubMed ID: 20616119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reward-modulated attention deployment is driven by suppression, not attentional capture. Taylor ED; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T Neuroimage; 2024 Oct; 299():120831. PubMed ID: 39233126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink. Bae E; Jung S; Han SW Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional engagement is not sufficient to prevent spatial capture. Zivony A; Lamy D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24043565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts. Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distractors associated with reward break through the focus of attention. Munneke J; Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Oct; 78(7):2213-25. PubMed ID: 26932872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets. Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture. Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection. MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli. Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distractor-induced blindness for orientation changes and coherent motion. Michael L; Hesselmann G; Kiefer M; Niedeggen M Vision Res; 2011 Aug; 51(15):1781-7. PubMed ID: 21703293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach. Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The time course of the contingent spatial blink. Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16035345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]