1409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25281942)
1. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of dose delivery variations on TomoTherapy using on-board detector based verification.
Hui C; Chen Q; Khandelwal S; Neal B; Watkins W
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(14):14NT02. PubMed ID: 29938689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monte Carlo based IMRT dose verification using MLC log files and R/V outputs.
Luo W; Li J; Price RA; Chen L; Yang J; Fan J; Chen Z; McNeeley S; Xu X; Ma CM
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2557-64. PubMed ID: 16898460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo based, patient-specific RapidArc QA using Linac log files.
Teke T; Bergman AM; Kwa W; Gill B; Duzenli C; Popescu IA
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 20175472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery.
Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3491-500. PubMed ID: 18777909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical implementation of an exit detector-based dose reconstruction tool for helical tomotherapy delivery quality assurance.
Deshpande S; Xing A; Metcalfe P; Holloway L; Vial P; Geurts M
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5457-5466. PubMed ID: 28737014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MCTP system model based on linear programming optimization of apertures obtained from sequencing patient image data maps.
Ureba A; Salguero FJ; Barbeiro AR; Jimenez-Ortega E; Baeza JA; Miras H; Linares R; Perucha M; Leal A
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081719. PubMed ID: 25086529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Using Monte Carlo Dose Calculation and Elekta Log Files for Prostate Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy.
Katsuta Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Shimizu E; Matsunaga K; Sawada K; Matsushita H; Majima K; Jingu K
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1220-1225. PubMed ID: 29334027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation of phantom-based and log file patient-specific QA with complexity scores for VMAT.
Agnew CE; Irvine DM; McGarry CK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):4994. PubMed ID: 25493524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A virtual source model for Monte Carlo simulation of helical tomotherapy.
Yuan J; Rong Y; Chen Q
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):4992. PubMed ID: 25679157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of independent dose calculation followed by machine log file analysis against conventional measurement based IMRT QA.
Sun B; Rangaraj D; Boddu S; Goddu M; Yang D; Palaniswaamy G; Yaddanapudi S; Wooten O; Mutic S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 13(5):3837. PubMed ID: 22955649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of machine log files/MC-based treatment planning and delivery QA as compared to ArcCHECK QA.
Stanhope CW; Drake DG; Liang J; Alber M; Söhn M; Habib C; Willcut V; Yan D
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2864-2874. PubMed ID: 29676463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Independent calculation of dose distributions for helical tomotherapy using a conventional treatment planning system.
Klüter S; Schubert K; Lissner S; Sterzing F; Oetzel D; Debus J; Schlegel W; Oelfke U; Nill S
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081709. PubMed ID: 25086519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Verification of helical tomotherapy delivery using autoassociative kernel regression.
Seibert RM; Ramsey CR; Garvey DR; Hines JW; Robison BH; Outten SS
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3249-62. PubMed ID: 17879788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monte Carlo implementation, validation, and characterization of a 120 leaf MLC.
Fix MK; Volken W; Frei D; Frauchiger D; Born EJ; Manser P
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5311-20. PubMed ID: 21992349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
