These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25281976)

  • 21. Right and left ventricular uptake with Rb-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging: markers of left main or 3 vessel disease.
    Abraham A; Kass M; Ruddy TD; deKemp RA; Lee AK; Ling MC; Ha A; Beanlands RS; Chow BJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2010; 17(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 19826892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optimization of Rb-82 PET acquisition and reconstruction protocols for myocardial perfusion defect detection.
    Tang J; Rahmim A; Lautamäki R; Lodge MA; Bengel FM; Tsui BM
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 May; 54(10):3161-71. PubMed ID: 19420417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Definition of vascular territories on myocardial perfusion images by integration with true coronary anatomy: a hybrid PET/CT analysis.
    Javadi MS; Lautamäki R; Merrill J; Voicu C; Epley W; McBride G; Bengel FM
    J Nucl Med; 2010 Feb; 51(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 20080895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Myocardial viability assessment by PET: (82)Rb defect washout does not predict the results of metabolic-perfusion mismatch.
    Stankewicz MA; Mansour CS; Eisner RL; Churchwell KB; Williams BR; Sigman SR; Streeter J; Patterson RE
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1602-9. PubMed ID: 16204709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Downward myocardial creep during stress PET imaging is inversely associated with mortality.
    Kuronuma K; Miller RJH; Wei CC; Singh A; Lemley MH; Van Kriekinge SD; Kavanagh PB; Gransar H; Han D; Hayes SW; Thomson L; Dey D; Friedman JD; Berman DS; Slomka PJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2024 May; 51(6):1622-1631. PubMed ID: 38253908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Moving into the next era of PET myocardial perfusion imaging: introduction of novel
    Werner RA; Chen X; Rowe SP; Lapa C; Javadi MS; Higuchi T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Mar; 35(3):569-577. PubMed ID: 30334228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Intersoftware variability impacts classification of cardiac PET exams.
    Oliveira JB; Sen YM; Wechalekar K
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):2007-2012. PubMed ID: 30238299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography.
    Chow BJ; Ananthasubramaniam K; dekemp RA; Dalipaj MM; Beanlands RS; Ruddy TD
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Apr; 45(8):1227-34. PubMed ID: 15837254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improvement in automated quantitation of myocardial perfusion abnormality by using iterative reconstruction image in combination with resolution recovery, attenuation and scatter corrections for the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Chono T; Onoguchi M; Shibutani T; Hashimoto A; Nakata T; Yama N; Tsuchihashi K; Hatakenaka M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2017 Feb; 31(2):181-189. PubMed ID: 28012120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiac 82Rubidium PET/CT: initial European experience.
    Groves AM; Speechly-Dick ME; Dickson JC; Kayani I; Endozo R; Blanchard P; Shastry M; Prvulovich E; Waddington WA; Ben-Haim S; Bomanji JB; McEwan JR; Ell PJ
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Dec; 34(12):1965-72. PubMed ID: 17768620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Added prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantitation in rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging.
    Farhad H; Dunet V; Bachelard K; Allenbach G; Kaufmann PA; Prior JO
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 14(12):1203-10. PubMed ID: 23660750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic value of vasodilator response using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease.
    Arasaratnam P; Sadreddini M; Yam Y; Kansal V; Dorbala S; Di Carli MF; Beanlands RS; Merhige ME; Williams BA; Veledar E; Min JK; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Germano G; Berman DS; Shaw LJ; Chow BJW
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Apr; 45(4):538-548. PubMed ID: 29177706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of
    Brophey MD; Farukhi IM; Castanon R; DeLaPena R; Bradshaw L; Banerjee S
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2017 Jun; 45(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 28408703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic value of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography in patients after heart transplant.
    Mc Ardle BA; Davies RA; Chen L; Small GR; Ruddy TD; Dwivedi G; Yam Y; Haddad H; Mielniczuk LM; Stadnick E; Hessian R; Guo A; Beanlands RS; deKemp RA; Chow BJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Nov; 7(6):930-7. PubMed ID: 25182366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of proton pump inhibitors on Rubidium-82 gastric uptake using positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Alzahrani AH; Arasaratnam P; Massalha S; Alenazy A; Lee A; Clarkin O; deKemp RA; Hossain A; Beanlands RS; Ruddy TD; Chow BJW
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Oct; 27(5):1443-1451. PubMed ID: 31768902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Myocardial creep and cardiorespiratory motion correction improves diagnostic accuracy of Rubidium-82 cardiac positron emission tomography.
    Lassen ML; Rasmussen T; Byrne C; Holmvang L; Kjaer A; Hasbak P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 30(6):2289-2300. PubMed ID: 37624562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mc Ardle BA; Dowsley TF; deKemp RA; Wells GA; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 60(18):1828-37. PubMed ID: 23040573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Sampson UK; Dorbala S; Limaye A; Kwong R; Di Carli MF
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 49(10):1052-8. PubMed ID: 17349884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Enhancement of dynamic myocardial perfusion PET images based on low-rank plus sparse decomposition.
    Lu L; Ma X; Mohy-Ud-Din H; Ma J; Feng Q; Rahmim A; Chen W
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Feb; 154():57-69. PubMed ID: 29249347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability by positron emission tomography.
    Anagnostopoulos C; Georgakopoulos A; Pianou N; Nekolla SG
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 167(5):1737-49. PubMed ID: 23313467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.