These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25282061)

  • 21. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bias for the left visual field in rapid serial visual presentation: effects of additional salient cues suggest a critical role of attention.
    Śmigasiewicz K; Asanowicz D; Westphal N; Verleger R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 27(2):266-79. PubMed ID: 25203275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spatial Inhibition of Return promotes changes in response-related mu and beta oscillatory patterns.
    Amenedo E; Gutiérrez-Domínguez FJ; Darriba Á; Pazo-Álvarez P
    Neuroscience; 2015 Dec; 310():616-28. PubMed ID: 26456119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Competitive interactions of attentional resources in early visual cortex during sustained visuospatial attention within or between visual hemifields: evidence for the different-hemifield advantage.
    Walter S; Quigley C; Mueller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):938-54. PubMed ID: 24345166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prism Adaptation Alters Electrophysiological Markers of Attentional Processes in the Healthy Brain.
    Martín-Arévalo E; Laube I; Koun E; Farnè A; Reilly KT; Pisella L
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(3):1019-30. PubMed ID: 26791229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does a causal relation exist between the functional hemispheric asymmetries of visual processing subsystems?
    Andresen DR; Marsolek CJ
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Nov; 59(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 16157436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study.
    Jiang Y; Han S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1444-54. PubMed ID: 15978507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing.
    Barthélémy S; Boulinguez P
    Behav Brain Res; 2002 Jun; 133(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 12048178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The strength of anticipatory spatial biasing predicts target discrimination at attended locations: a high-density EEG study.
    Kelly SP; Gomez-Ramirez M; Foxe JJ
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 30(11):2224-34. PubMed ID: 19930401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Age-related changes in the attentional control of visual cortex: a selective problem in the left visual hemifield.
    Nagamatsu LS; Carolan P; Liu-Ambrose TY; Handy TC
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1670-8. PubMed ID: 21356222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sustained visual-spatial attention produces costs and benefits in response time and evoked neural activity.
    Mangun GR; Buck LA
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Mar; 36(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 9622184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Lateral asymmetries in visual perception: a review of tachistoscopic visual half-field studies.
    Pirozzolo FJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 1):695-701. PubMed ID: 600617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition.
    Yamaoka K; Michimata C
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 26289477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Asymmetrical brain activity induced by voluntary spatial attention depends on the visual hemifield: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.
    Harasawa M; Shioiri S
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 21330028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Emotionally arousing stimuli compete for attention with left hemispace.
    Hartikainen KM; Ogawa KH; Soltani M; Knight RT
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1929-33. PubMed ID: 18007189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.