247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25282305)
1. Computational models to predict endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with androgen or oestrogen receptors.
Chen Y; Cheng F; Sun L; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2014 Dec; 110():280-7. PubMed ID: 25282305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of putative estrogen receptor-mediated endocrine disrupting chemicals using QSAR- and structure-based virtual screening approaches.
Zhang L; Sedykh A; Tripathi A; Zhu H; Afantitis A; Mouchlis VD; Melagraki G; Rusyn I; Tropsha A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Oct; 272(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 23707773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development, validation and integration of in silico models to identify androgen active chemicals.
Manganelli S; Roncaglioni A; Mansouri K; Judson RS; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Ruiz P
Chemosphere; 2019 Apr; 220():204-215. PubMed ID: 30584954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling and insights into the structural characteristics of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
Zhang R; Wang B; Li L; Li S; Guo H; Zhang P; Hua Y; Cui X; Li Y; Mu Y; Huang X; Li X
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2023 Sep; 263():115251. PubMed ID: 37451095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human sex hormone-binding globulin binding affinities of 125 structurally diverse chemicals and comparison with their binding to androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, and α-fetoprotein.
Hong H; Branham WS; Ng HW; Moland CL; Dial SL; Fang H; Perkins R; Sheehan D; Tong W
Toxicol Sci; 2015 Feb; 143(2):333-48. PubMed ID: 25349334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Classification and virtual screening of androgen receptor antagonists.
Li J; Gramatica P
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 May; 50(5):861-74. PubMed ID: 20405856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In Silico Molecular Docking and In Vivo Validation with
Jeong J; Kim H; Choi J
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Mar; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 30857347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying potential endocrine disruptors among industrial chemicals and their metabolites--development and evaluation of in silico tools.
Rybacka A; Rudén C; Tetko IV; Andersson PL
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 139():372-8. PubMed ID: 26210185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computational prediction models for assessing endocrine disrupting potential of chemicals.
Sakkiah S; Guo W; Pan B; Kusko R; Tong W; Hong H
J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2018; 36(4):192-218. PubMed ID: 30633647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. QSAR classification of estrogen receptor binders and pre-screening of potential pleiotropic EDCs.
Li J; Gramatica P
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):657-69. PubMed ID: 21120754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binary classification of a large collection of environmental chemicals from estrogen receptor assays by quantitative structure-activity relationship and machine learning methods.
Zang Q; Rotroff DM; Judson RS
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Dec; 53(12):3244-61. PubMed ID: 24279462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity.
Xu C; Cheng F; Chen L; Du Z; Li W; Liu G; Lee PW; Tang Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):2840-7. PubMed ID: 23030379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In silico methods in the discovery of endocrine disrupting chemicals.
Vuorinen A; Odermatt A; Schuster D
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol; 2013 Sep; 137():18-26. PubMed ID: 23688835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A ternary classification using machine learning methods of distinct estrogen receptor activities within a large collection of environmental chemicals.
Zhang Q; Yan L; Wu Y; Ji L; Chen Y; Zhao M; Dong X
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():1268-1275. PubMed ID: 28011018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. QSAR study of natural, synthetic and environmental endocrine disrupting compounds for binding to the androgen receptor.
Zhao CY; Zhang RS; Zhang HX; Xue CX; Liu HX; Liu MC; Hu ZD; Fan BT
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 16234176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Machine Learning Consensus To Predict the Binding to the Androgen Receptor within the CoMPARA Project.
Grisoni F; Consonni V; Ballabio D
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1839-1848. PubMed ID: 30668916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conformal prediction to define applicability domain - A case study on predicting ER and AR binding.
Norinder U; Rybacka A; Andersson PL
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Apr; 27(4):303-16. PubMed ID: 27088868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined Naïve Bayesian, Chemical Fingerprints and Molecular Docking Classifiers to Model and Predict Androgen Receptor Binding Data for Environmentally- and Health-Sensitive Substances.
García-Sosa AT; Maran U
Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 34206613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The applications of machine learning algorithms in the modeling of estrogen-like chemicals.
Liu H; Yao X; Gramatica P
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2009 Jun; 12(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19519328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integration of in silico methods and computational systems biology to explore endocrine-disrupting chemical binding with nuclear hormone receptors.
Ruiz P; Sack A; Wampole M; Bobst S; Vracko M
Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 178():99-109. PubMed ID: 28319747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
