338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25282326)
21. Factors that influence mammography screening behaviour: a qualitative study of Greek women's experiences.
Kaltsa A; Holloway A; Cox K
Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2013 Jun; 17(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 22954490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Narrowing the equity gap: the impact of organized versus opportunistic cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain).
Espinas JA; Aliste L; Fernandez E; Argimon JM; Tresserras R; Borras JM
J Med Screen; 2011; 18(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 21852701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The impact of depression on adherence to organized and opportunistic breast cancer screening.
Montagna G; Schneeberger AR; Rossi L; Reina H; Schwab FD; Schoetzau A; Eichholzer M; Pagani O; Weber WP; Kurzeder C; Güth U; Huber CG
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2020 Jan; 29(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 30998527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Reluctances in organized breast cancer screenig in Yvelines].
Tomietto M; Soyer P; Heitz D; Fauconnier A; Huchon C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Nov; 42(11):761-5. PubMed ID: 25442823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Mammography screening and breast cancer mortality in Australia: an aggregate cohort study.
Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Dobson A
J Med Screen; 2012 Mar; 19(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 22345322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening in Spanish women with diabetes: associated factors and trend between 2006 and 2010.
Martinez-Huedo MA; Lopez de Andres A; Hernandez-Barrera V; Carrasco-Garrido P; Martinez Hernandez D; Jiménez-Garcia R
Diabetes Metab; 2012 Apr; 38(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 22078638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mammography use and mode of detection among breast cancer patients in Estonia.
Innos K; Valvere V; Padrik P; Eelma E; Kütner R; Lehtsaar J; Tekkel M
Women Health; 2016; 56(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 26327255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Difficulties in implementing an organized screening program for breast cancer in Brazil with emphasis on diagnostic methods.
Silva TB; Mauad EC; Carvalho AL; Jacobs LA; Shulman LN
Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(2):2321. PubMed ID: 23597169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. How frequently should women undergo mammography screening?
Ciatto S
Womens Health (Lond); 2010 Mar; 6(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 20187719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. To what extent is women's economic situation associated with cancer screening uptake when nationwide screening exists? A study of breast and cervical cancer screening in France in 2010.
Menvielle G; Richard JB; Ringa V; Dray-Spira R; Beck F
Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 24842393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Barriers to Organized Mammography Screening Programs in Hungary: A Questionnaire-based Study of 3,313 Women.
Újhelyi M; Pukancsik D; Kelemen P; Kovács E; Kenessey I; Bak M; Kásler M; Kovács T; Mátrai Z
Anticancer Res; 2018 Mar; 38(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 29491109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mapping Variation in Breast Cancer Screening: Where to Intervene?
Padilla CM; Painblanc F; Soler-Michel P; Vieira VM
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 31252599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Socioeconomic and healthcare supply statistical determinants of compliance to mammography screening programs: a multilevel analysis in Calvados, France.
Pornet C; Dejardin O; Morlais F; Bouvier V; Launoy G
Cancer Epidemiol; 2010 Jun; 34(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 20403737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Organised population-based programmes and change in socioeconomic inequalities in mammography screening: A 1992-2012 nationwide quasi-experimental study.
Cullati S; von Arx M; Courvoisier DS; Sandoval JL; Manor O; Burton-Jeangros C; Bouchardy C; Guessous I
Prev Med; 2018 Nov; 116():19-26. PubMed ID: 30145347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pattern of participation in a cohort aged 50-60 years at first invitation to the service-screening programme with mammography in Stockholm county, Sweden.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Svane G; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Nyström L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):728-33. PubMed ID: 16137757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Overdiagnosis in the population-based organized breast cancer screening program estimated by a non-homogeneous multi-state model: a cohort study using individual data with long-term follow-up.
Wu WY; Törnberg S; Elfström KM; Liu X; Nyström L; Jonsson H
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):153. PubMed ID: 30558679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Breast cancer screening in women aged 50-74 years: is there room for improvement?
Morère JF; Pivot X; Viguier J; Blay JY; Calazel-Benque A; Coscas Y; Roussel C; Eisinger F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2011 Jan; 20 Suppl 1():S8-S12. PubMed ID: 21245683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Participation in Swiss mammography screening programmes: key role of physicians].
Bulliard JL; de Landtsheer JP; Levi F
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2005 Sep; 94(36):1381-7. PubMed ID: 16190371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Temporal trend in socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of cancer screening programmes in France between 2005 and 2010: results from the Cancer Barometer surveys.
Kelly DM; Estaquio C; Léon C; Arwidson P; Nabi H
BMJ Open; 2017 Dec; 7(12):e016941. PubMed ID: 29247085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Introduction of an organised programme and social inequalities in mammography screening: A 22-year population-based study in Geneva, Switzerland.
Sandoval JL; Theler JM; Cullati S; Bouchardy C; Manor O; Gaspoz JM; Guessous I
Prev Med; 2017 Oct; 103():49-55. PubMed ID: 28778819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
