124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25282680)
1. Assessment of scoliotic deformity using spinous processes: comparison of different analysis methods of an ultrasonographic system.
Koo TK; Guo JY; Ippolito C; Bedle JC
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014; 37(9):667-77. PubMed ID: 25282680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A mathematical expression of three-dimensional configuration of the scoliotic spine.
Kanayama M; Tadano S; Kaneda K; Ukai T; Abumi K
J Biomech Eng; 1996 May; 118(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8738791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A computerized method for evaluating scoliotic deformities using elliptical pattern recognition in X-ray spine images.
Pinheiro AP; Coelho JC; Veiga ACP; Vrtovec T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():85-92. PubMed ID: 29852970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Oct; 17(8):559-68. PubMed ID: 12243715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cobb angle versus spinous process angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The relationship of the anterior and posterior deformities.
Herzenberg JE; Waanders NA; Closkey RF; Schultz AB; Hensinger RN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Sep; 15(9):874-9. PubMed ID: 2259973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of concave and convex rib-vertebral angle, angle difference, and angle ratio in patients with lenke type 1 main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by observation, bracing or posterior fusion, and instrumentation.
Canavese F; Holveck J; De Coulon G; Kaelin A
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):506-13. PubMed ID: 21336172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulmonary function and spinal characteristics: their relationships in persons with idiopathic and postpoliomyelitic scoliosis.
Lin MC; Liaw MY; Chen WJ; Cheng PT; Wong AM; Chiou WK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Mar; 82(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 11245755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical analysis of the vertebral and rib deformities in structural scoliosis.
Wever DJ; Veldhuizen AG; Klein JP; Webb PJ; Nijenbanning G; Cool JC; v Horn JR
Eur Spine J; 1999; 8(4):252-60. PubMed ID: 10483825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional surface rendering reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae using a non stereo-corresponding points technique.
Mitulescu A; Skalli W; Mitton D; De Guise JA
Eur Spine J; 2002 Aug; 11(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 12193996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Validation of the DTP-3 system for noninvasive spinal shape measurement by comparison with X-ray examination].
Krejčí J; Gallo J; Salinger J; Štěpaník P
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(3):255-62. PubMed ID: 22840958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of spinal deformity in scoliosis from torso surface cross sections.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Jul; 26(14):1583-91. PubMed ID: 11462091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Cobb angles measured manually, calculated from 3-D spinal reconstruction, and estimated from torso asymmetry.
Jaremko JL; Poncet P; Ronsky J; Harder J; Dansereau J; Labelle H; Zernicke RF
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Aug; 5(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 12186706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of postoperative residual spinal deformity and patient outcome in idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan using the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument.
Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):550-4. PubMed ID: 17334289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Correlation study between spinal curvatures and vertebral and disk deformities in idiopathic scoliosis].
Villemure I; Aubin CE; Dansereau J; Petit Y; Labelle H
Ann Chir; 1999; 53(8):798-807. PubMed ID: 10584392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Spinal cord intramedullary pressure in thoracic scoliotic deformity: a cadaveric study.
Pettigrew DB; Fessler RD; Farley CW; Al-Nafi S; Holtz JR; Wiebracht ND; Look AC; Kuntz C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Feb; 40(4):E242-7. PubMed ID: 25423307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Double Rib Contour Sign (DRCS) in lateral spinal radiographs: aetiologic implications for scoliosis.
Grivas TB; Dangas S; Polyzois BD; Samelis P
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():38-43. PubMed ID: 15456003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction of flexible thoracic scoliosis below 65 degrees--a radiological comparison of anterior versus posterior segmental instrumentation applied to similar curves.
Kotwicki T; Dubousset J; Padovani JP
Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):972-81. PubMed ID: 16586108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
