These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25283765)

  • 1. Decision-making in post-acquittal hospital release: how do forensic evaluators make their decisions?
    Gowensmith WN; Bryant AE; Vitacco MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2014 Sep; 32(5):596-607. PubMed ID: 25283765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychosis and Substance Use: Implications for Conditional Release Readiness Evaluations.
    Tabernik HE; Vitacco MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):295-307. PubMed ID: 27021306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Field reliability influences field validity: Risk assessments of individuals found not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT; McNichols BJ
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Jun; 29(6):786-794. PubMed ID: 28594220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluator agreement in placement recommendations for insanity acquittees.
    Stredny RV; Parker AL; Dibble AE
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 22231548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with the conditional release of persons acquitted by reason of insanity: a decision tree approach.
    Callahan LA; Silver E
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Apr; 22(2):147-63. PubMed ID: 9566120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making.
    Pitt SE; Brandt JD; Tellefsen C; Janofsky JS; Cohen ME; Bettis ED; Rappeport JR
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 9148886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using the HCR-20
    Cabeldue M; Green D; Griswold H; Schneider M; Smith J; Belfi B; Kunz M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Sep; 46(3):339-350. PubMed ID: 30368466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
    Elliott RL; Nelson E; Fitch WL; Scott R; Wolber G; Singh R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1993; 21(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 8148513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transferring juvenile defendants from adult to juvenile court: how Maryland forensic evaluators and judges reach their decisions.
    Means RF; Heller LD; Janofsky JS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 22960915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditional Release of Forensic Psychiatric Patients Consistent with or Contrary to Behavioral Experts' Recommendations in the Netherlands: Prevalence Rates, Patient Characteristics and Recidivism After Discharge from Conditional Release.
    Nagtegaal MH; Boonmann C
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):257-77. PubMed ID: 27256002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The review panel process: an algorithm for the conditional release of insanity acquittees.
    McDermott BE; Thompson JW
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(2):101-11. PubMed ID: 16386791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of criminal responsibility reports submitted to the Hawaii judiciary.
    Fuger KD; Acklin MW; Nguyen AH; Ignacio LA; Gowensmith WN
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(3):272-80. PubMed ID: 24326082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Insanity findings and evaluation practices: A state-wide review of court-ordered reports.
    O Gardner B; C Murrie D; N Torres A
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 May; 36(3):303-316. PubMed ID: 29722059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Version 3 of the historical-clinical-risk management-20 (HCR-20V3): relevance to violence risk assessment and management in forensic conditional release contexts.
    Douglas KS
    Behav Sci Law; 2014 Sep; 32(5):557-76. PubMed ID: 25278316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How reliable are forensic evaluations of legal sanity?
    Gowensmith WN; Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22775304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing Insanity Acquittee Recidivism in Connecticut.
    Norko MA; Wasser T; Magro H; Leavitt-Smith E; Morton FJ; Hollis T
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):423-43. PubMed ID: 27061306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The conditional release of insanity acquittees: three decades of decision-making.
    McDermott BE; Scott CL; Busse D; Andrade F; Zozaya M; Quanbeck CD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 18802180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Disposition of insanity acquittees in Illinois.
    Wettstein RM; Mulvey EP
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 3365475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New Frontiers for Conditional Release: Applying Lessons Learned from Other Offenders with Mental Illness.
    Gowensmith WN; Peters AJ; Lex IA; Heng AK; Robinson KP; Huston BA
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Mar; 34(2-3):407-22. PubMed ID: 26989858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Court-mandated community outpatient treatment for persons found not guilty by reason of insanity: a five-year follow-up.
    Lamb HR; Weinberger LE; Gross BH
    Am J Psychiatry; 1988 Apr; 145(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 3348447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.