404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25284135)
1. An environment-adaptive management algorithm for hearing-support devices incorporating listening situation and noise type classifiers.
Yook S; Nam KW; Kim H; Hong SH; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Apr; 39(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 25284135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Diagonal-Steering-Based Binaural Beamforming Algorithm Incorporating a Diagonal Speech Localizer for Persons With Bilateral Hearing Impairment.
Lee JC; Nam KW; Jang DP; Kim IY
Artif Organs; 2015 Dec; 39(12):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25959133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acoustic and perceptual effects of magnifying interaural difference cues in a simulated "binaural" hearing aid.
de Taillez T; Grimm G; Kollmeier B; Neher T
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S81-S91. PubMed ID: 28395561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of spectral change enhancement for the hearing impaired using parameter values selected with a genetic algorithm.
Chen J; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2910-20. PubMed ID: 23654396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extension and evaluation of a near-end listening enhancement algorithm for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Rennies J; Drefs J; Hülsmeier D; Schepker H; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2526. PubMed ID: 28464693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The performance of an automatic acoustic-based program classifier compared to hearing aid users' manual selection of listening programs.
Searchfield GD; Linford T; Kobayashi K; Crowhen D; Latzel M
Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):201-212. PubMed ID: 29069954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
Ohlenforst B; Wendt D; Kramer SE; Naylor G; Zekveld AA; Lunner T
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling the Intelligibility Benefit of Active Noise Cancelation in Hearing Devices That Improve Signal-to-Noise Ratio.
Sabin AT; McElhone D; Gauger D; Rabinowitz B
Trends Hear; 2024; 28():23312165241260029. PubMed ID: 38831646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners.
Sang J; Hu H; Zheng C; Li G; Lutman ME; Bleeck S
Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 310():36-47. PubMed ID: 24495441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications.
Kortlang S; Chen Z; Gerkmann T; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Ewert SD
Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S43-S54. PubMed ID: 28355947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability-controlled hybrid adaptive feedback cancellation scheme for hearing aids.
Nordholm S; Schepker H; Tran LTT; Doclo S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jan; 143(1):150. PubMed ID: 29390746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech quality and stable gain trade-offs in adaptive feedback cancellation for hearing aids.
Lee CH; Kates JM; Rao BD; Garudadri H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Oct; 142(4):EL388. PubMed ID: 29092590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An efficient robust sound classification algorithm for hearing aids.
Nordqvist P; Leijon A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jun; 115(6):3033-41. PubMed ID: 15237827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of reverberation, background talker number, and compression release time on signal-to-noise ratio.
Reinhart P; Zahorik P; Souza PE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):EL130. PubMed ID: 28764441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music.
Parsa V; Scollie S; Glista D; Seelisch A
Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):54-68. PubMed ID: 23539261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
