BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25284701)

  • 1. Morphological relationship between the cranial and supraorbital regions in Homo sapiens.
    Nowaczewska W; Kuźmiński Ł; Biecek P
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2015 Jan; 156(1):110-24. PubMed ID: 25284701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship of cranial, orbital and nasal cavity size with the morphology of the supraorbital region in modern
    Nowaczewska W; Łapicka U; Cieślik A; Biecek P
    Anthropol Anz; 2017 Sep; 74(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 28765870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Morphometric testing of structural hypotheses of the supraorbital region in modern humans.
    Vinyard CJ; Smith FH
    Z Morphol Anthropol; 2001; 83(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 11372465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The meaning of the shape of the frontal bone, facial retraction and prognathism for the degree of gracilisation of the supraorbital region in
    Nowaczewska W; Kubicka AM; Piontek J; Biecek P
    Anthropol Anz; 2022 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 35174848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The frontal bone in the genus Homo: a survey of functional and phylogenetic sources of variation.
    Athreya S
    J Anthropol Sci; 2012; 90():59-80. PubMed ID: 22781585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of frontal bone morphology among Pleistocene hominin fossil groups.
    Athreya S
    J Hum Evol; 2009 Dec; 57(6):786-804. PubMed ID: 19878968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sexual dimorphism in human browridge volume measured from 3D models of dry crania: a new digital morphometrics approach.
    Shearer BM; Sholts SB; Garvin HM; Wärmländer SK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):400.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22776689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Morphological adaptation to climate in modern Homo sapiens crania: the importance of basicranial breadth.
    Nowaczewska W; Dabrowski P; Kuźmiński Ł
    Coll Antropol; 2011 Sep; 35(3):625-36. PubMed ID: 22053534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geometric variation of the frontal squama in the genus homo: frontal bulging and the origin of modern human morphology.
    Bruner E; Athreya S; de la Cuétara JM; Marks T
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2013 Feb; 150(2):313-23. PubMed ID: 23292748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ontogenetic study of the supraorbital region in modern humans: a longitudinal test of the spatial model.
    Fiscella GN; Smith FH
    Anthropol Anz; 2006 Jun; 64(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 16850766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resolving relationships between several Neolithic and Mesolithic populations in Northern Eurasia using geometric morphometrics.
    Stansfield Bulygina E; Rasskasova A; Berezina N; Soficaru AD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2017 Sep; 164(1):163-183. PubMed ID: 28639281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human cranial anatomy and the differential preservation of population history and climate signatures.
    Harvati K; Weaver TD
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2006 Dec; 288(12):1225-33. PubMed ID: 17075844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patterning of geographic variation in Middle Pleistocene Homo frontal bone morphology.
    Athreya S
    J Hum Evol; 2006 Jun; 50(6):627-43. PubMed ID: 16678885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphological affinities of the Sal'a 1 frontal bone.
    Sládek V; Trinkaus E; Sefcáková A; Halouzka R
    J Hum Evol; 2002 Dec; 43(6):787-815. PubMed ID: 12473484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Neanderthal markers of the frontal bone--a conspicuous Hallstatt cranium of the burial field Dietfurt/Oberpfalz].
    Claassen H
    Anthropol Anz; 1991 Mar; 49(1-2):3-21. PubMed ID: 1859196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship of cranial robusticity to cranial form, geography and climate in Homo sapiens.
    Baab KL; Freidline SE; Wang SL; Hanson T
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Jan; 141(1):97-115. PubMed ID: 19554616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masticatory-stress hypotheses and the supraorbital region of primates.
    Hylander WL; Picq PG; Johnson KR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1991 Sep; 86(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 1951658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual dimorphism in human cranial trait scores: effects of population, age, and body size.
    Garvin HM; Sholts SB; Mosca LA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2014 Jun; 154(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 24595622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landmark-based analysis of the morphological relationship between endocranial shape and traces of the middle meningeal vessels.
    Bruner E; Mantini S; Ripani M
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2009 Apr; 292(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 19226614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variation among early North American crania.
    Jantz RL; Owsley DW
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2001 Feb; 114(2):146-55. PubMed ID: 11169904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.