These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25284975)
1. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study. Pajic B; Vastardis I; Pajic-Eggspuehler B; Gatzioufas Z; Hafezi F Clin Ophthalmol; 2014; 8():1883-9. PubMed ID: 25284975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for flap cutting in LASIK. Xia LK; Yu J; Chai GR; Wang D; Li Y Int J Ophthalmol; 2015; 8(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 26309880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femtosecond-Assisted Laser in situ Keratomileusis with de novo Flap Creation Following Previous Microkeratome Laser in situ Keratomileusis. Rush SW; Rush RB Clin Ophthalmol; 2021; 15():1813-1818. PubMed ID: 33958854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism. Kahuam-López N; Navas A; Castillo-Salgado C; Graue-Hernandez EO; Jimenez-Corona A; Ibarra A Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012946. PubMed ID: 32255519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome flap creation. Antonios R; Arba Mosquera S; Awwad ST J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1602-9. PubMed ID: 26432116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraoperative subtraction pachymetry and postoperative anterior segment optical coherence tomography of laser in situ keratomileusis flaps. Murakami Y; Manche EE J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1879-83. PubMed ID: 21840682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flap Thickness and the Risk of Complications in Mechanical Microkeratome and Femtosecond Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: A Literature Review and Statistical Analysis. Kanclerz P; Khoramnia R Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34573930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cox proportional hazards model of myopic regression for laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with a femtosecond laser and with a mechanical microkeratome. Lin MY; Chang DC; Hsu WM; Wang IJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 38(6):992-9. PubMed ID: 22624898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual outcomes after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis flap complications. Jadav DS; Desai N; Taylor KR; Caldwell MC; Panday VA; Reilly CD J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2487-92. PubMed ID: 26703500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dry eye associated with laser in situ keratomileusis: Mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser. Salomão MQ; Ambrósio R; Wilson SE J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1756-60. PubMed ID: 19781472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular straylight after thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser versus a mechanical microkeratome. Wang Y; Li J; Liu Y; Xie L J Refract Surg; 2013 Aug; 29(8):534-9. PubMed ID: 23909780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted. Zhou J; Gu W; Li S; Wu L; Gao Y; Guo X Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Changes in Keratocyte Density and Visual Function Five Years After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis: Femtosecond Laser Versus Mechanical Microkeratome. McLaren JW; Bourne WM; Maguire LJ; Patel SV Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jul; 160(1):163-70. PubMed ID: 25868758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thin-Flap Laser In Situ Keratomileusis-Associated Dry Eye: A Comparative Study Between Femtosecond Laser and Mechanical Microkeratome-Assisted Laser In Situ Keratomileusis. Abdel-Radi M; Abdelmotaal H; Anwar M Eye Contact Lens; 2022 Jan; 48(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 34644283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors influencing corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser. Kim CY; Song JH; Na KS; Chung SH; Joo CK Korean J Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 21350688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of age on visual and refractive results after LASIK: mechanical microkeratome versus femtosecond laser. Garcia-Gonzalez M; Gros-Otero J; Rodriguez-Perez I; Rodero A; Teus MA Int J Ophthalmol; 2019; 12(3):488-495. PubMed ID: 30918820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of Lasik with femtosecond laser versus Lasik with mechanical microkeratome: predictability of flap depth, corneal biomechanical effects and optical aberrations]. Kouassi FX; Blaizeau M; Buestel C; Schweitzer C; Gallois A; Colin J; Touboul D J Fr Ophtalmol; 2012 Jan; 35(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 21676493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Flap Morphology and Predictability by WaveLight FS200 Femtosecond Laser and Moria Microkeratome: An Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography Study. Eldaly ZH; Abdelsalam MA; Hussein MS; Nassr MA Korean J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):113-121. PubMed ID: 30977320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]