These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25285995)

  • 1. Where did it come from, where do you go? Direction sources influence navigation decisions during spatial uncertainty.
    Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL; Gopal N; Holmes A; Taylor HA; Tenbrink T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(3):585-607. PubMed ID: 25285995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct current brain stimulation enhances navigation efficiency in individuals with low spatial sense of direction.
    Brunyé TT; Holmes A; Cantelon J; Eddy MD; Gardony AL; Mahoney CR; Taylor HA
    Neuroreport; 2014 Oct; 25(15):1175-9. PubMed ID: 25144391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The path more travelled: Time pressure increases reliance on familiar route-based strategies during navigation.
    Brunyé TT; Wood MD; Houck LA; Taylor HA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1439-1452. PubMed ID: 27156528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognitive focus affects spatial decisions under conditions of uncertainty.
    Tenbrink T; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT; Gagnon SA; Gardony AL
    Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 31974762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feedback and Direction Sources Influence Navigation Decision Making on Experienced Routes.
    Li Y; Li W; Yang Y; Wang Q
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2104. PubMed ID: 31572278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verbalizing, visualizing, and navigating: The effect of strategies on encoding a large-scale virtual environment.
    Kraemer DJ; Schinazi VR; Cawkwell PB; Tekriwal A; Epstein RA; Thompson-Schill SL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):611-621. PubMed ID: 27668486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual differences in cognitive map accuracy: Investigating the role of landmark familiarity.
    Youngson NL; Vollebregt M; Sutton JE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Mar; 73(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 30883177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.
    Keil J; Edler D; Kuchinke L; Dickmann F
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229575. PubMed ID: 32119712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial cognition in bats and rats: from sensory acquisition to multiscale maps and navigation.
    Geva-Sagiv M; Las L; Yovel Y; Ulanovsky N
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2015 Feb; 16(2):94-108. PubMed ID: 25601780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial reorientation with non-visual cues: Failure to spontaneously use auditory information.
    Nardi D; Anzures BJ; Clark JM; Griffith BV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1141-1154. PubMed ID: 29776317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human place and response learning: navigation strategy selection, pupil size and gaze behavior.
    de Condappa O; Wiener JM
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 25537525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introducing a new age-and-cognition-sensitive measurement for assessing spatial orientation using a landmark-less virtual reality navigational task.
    Ranjbar Pouya O; Byagowi A; Kelly DM; Moussavi Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jul; 70(7):1406-1419. PubMed ID: 27156658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human navigation strategies and their errors result from dynamic interactions of spatial uncertainties.
    Kessler F; Frankenstein J; Rothkopf CA
    Nat Commun; 2024 Jul; 15(1):5677. PubMed ID: 38971789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal features of spatial knowledge: Representing order and duration of topographical information.
    Teghil A; Boccia M; Bonavita A; Guariglia C
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():112218. PubMed ID: 31499091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do (some) people make a cognitive map? Routes, places, and working memory.
    Weisberg SM; Newcombe NS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 May; 42(5):768-785. PubMed ID: 26595065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncertainty promotes information-seeking actions, but what information?
    Keller AM; Taylor HA; Brunyé TT
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Sep; 5(1):42. PubMed ID: 32894402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reference frames in spatial communication for navigation and sports: an empirical study in ultimate frisbee players.
    Weisberg SM; Chatterjee A
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Nov; 5(1):53. PubMed ID: 33151358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Representation of human spatial navigation responding to input spatial information and output navigational strategies: An ALE meta-analysis.
    Qiu Y; Wu Y; Liu R; Wang J; Huang H; Huang R
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2019 Aug; 103():60-72. PubMed ID: 31201830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lost in virtual space: studies in human and ideal spatial navigation.
    Stankiewicz BJ; Legge GE; Mansfield JS; Schlicht EJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Jun; 32(3):688-704. PubMed ID: 16822132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Belief revision and way-finding.
    Bucher L; Röser F; Nejasmic J; Hamburger K
    Cogn Process; 2014 Feb; 15(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 24037389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.