BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25286229)

  • 1. Comparing score tests and other local dependence diagnostics for the graded response model.
    Liu Y; Thissen D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):496-513. PubMed ID: 25286229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing hypotheses involving Cronbach's alpha using marginal models.
    Kuijpers RE; van der Ark LA; Croon MA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):503-20. PubMed ID: 23663052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Estimation of Cronbach's alpha coefficient in the context of item response theory].
    Shojima K; Toyoda H
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Aug; 73(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 12436881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the Lagrange Multiplier Test for Assessing Measurement Invariance Under Model Misspecification.
    Guastadisegni L; Cagnone S; Moustaki I; Vasdekis V
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):254-280. PubMed ID: 35185159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of ignoring item interactions on the estimated discrimination parameters in item response theory.
    Tuerlinckx F; De Boeck P
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Jun; 6(2):181-95. PubMed ID: 11411441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.
    Cai L; Hansen M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):245-76. PubMed ID: 22642552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semi-parametric proportional hazards models with crossed random effects for psychometric response times.
    Loeys T; Legrand C; Schettino A; Pourtois G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 May; 67(2):304-27. PubMed ID: 23937392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A graded response model for measuring person reliability.
    Ferrando PJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Nov; 62(Pt 3):641-62. PubMed ID: 19159504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polytomous multilevel testlet models for testlet-based assessments with complex sampling designs.
    Jiao H; Zhang Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 24571376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Applying the Rasch sampler to identify aberrant responding through person fit statistics under fixed nominal α-level.
    Spoden C; Fleischer J; Leutner D
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 24992251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bayesian item fit analysis for unidimensional item response theory models.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 Nov; 59(Pt 2):429-49. PubMed ID: 17067420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An investigation of DIF mechanisms in the context of differential testlet effects.
    Paek I; Fukuhara H
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 Feb; 68(1):142-57. PubMed ID: 24661184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosing item score patterns on a test using item response theory-based person-fit statistics.
    Meijer RR
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Mar; 8(1):72-87. PubMed ID: 12741674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing equivalence with repeated measures: tests of the difference model of two-alternative forced-choice performance.
    García-Pérez MA; Alcalá-Quintana R
    Span J Psychol; 2011 Nov; 14(2):1023-49. PubMed ID: 22059346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the pi* goodness of fit index for finite mixtures of item response models.
    Revuelta J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):93-113. PubMed ID: 18482477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences on the Mantel-Haenszel chi-square in detection of differential item functioning under Rasch conditions.
    Uttaro T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 2):1071-4. PubMed ID: 7478860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.