These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25286314)
1. The neural bases of crossmodal object recognition in non-human primates and rodents: a review. Cloke JM; Jacklin DL; Winters BD Behav Brain Res; 2015 May; 285():118-30. PubMed ID: 25286314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Crossmodal object recognition in rats with and without multimodal object pre-exposure: no effect of hippocampal lesions. Reid JM; Jacklin DL; Winters BD Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Oct; 98(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 22975081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development. Jao RJ; James TW; James KH Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():76-89. PubMed ID: 26272239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Dynamic Multisensory Engram: Neural Circuitry Underlying Crossmodal Object Recognition in Rats Changes with the Nature of Object Experience. Jacklin DL; Cloke JM; Potvin A; Garrett I; Winters BD J Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 36(4):1273-89. PubMed ID: 26818515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Delineating prefrontal cortex region contributions to crossmodal object recognition in rats. Reid JM; Jacklin DL; Winters BD Cereb Cortex; 2014 Aug; 24(8):2108-19. PubMed ID: 23505287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition. Amedi A; von Kriegstein K; van Atteveldt NM; Beauchamp MS; Naumer MJ Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):559-71. PubMed ID: 16028028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oscillatory signatures of crossmodal congruence effects: An EEG investigation employing a visuotactile pattern matching paradigm. Göschl F; Friese U; Daume J; König P; Engel AK Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 116():177-86. PubMed ID: 25846580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence for a specific role for muscarinic receptors in crossmodal object recognition in rats. Jacklin DL; Kelly P; Bianchi C; MacDonald T; Traquair H; Winters BD Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Feb; 118():125-32. PubMed ID: 25490059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Representations of microgeometric tactile information during object recognition. Yasaka K; Mori T; Yamaguchi M; Kaba H Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 30446884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are representations of unfamiliar faces independent of encoding modality? Casey SJ; Newell FN Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):506-13. PubMed ID: 16597451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The left fusiform gyrus hosts trisensory representations of manipulable objects. Kassuba T; Klinge C; Hölig C; Menz MM; Ptito M; Röder B; Siebner HR Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1566-77. PubMed ID: 21334444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A distributed cortical representation underlies crossmodal object recognition in rats. Winters BD; Reid JM J Neurosci; 2010 May; 30(18):6253-61. PubMed ID: 20445051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory. Schendan HE; Kutas M J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 May; 19(5):734-49. PubMed ID: 17488201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Superadditive responses in superior temporal sulcus predict audiovisual benefits in object categorization. Werner S; Noppeney U Cereb Cortex; 2010 Aug; 20(8):1829-42. PubMed ID: 19923200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transfer of object category knowledge across visual and haptic modalities: experimental and computational studies. Yildirim I; Jacobs RA Cognition; 2013 Feb; 126(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 23102553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]