144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25286340)
1. Optimal asymmetric thread for orthodontic microimplants: Laboratory and clinical evaluation.
Alrbata RH; Ha DW; Yu W; Kyung HM
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 25286340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surface characteristics and mechanical behavior of retrieved orthodontic microimplants.
Lu L; Park HS
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2018 May; 19(5):372-382. PubMed ID: 29732748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gripping and Anchoring Effects on the Mechanical Strengths of Orthodontic Microimplants.
Chen CM; Ting CC; Wang HC; Tseng YC
Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):288-293. PubMed ID: 29781832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Tung YY; Chiang YY; Lai EH; Chen WP; Lin CP
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 22381488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of insertion angle and implant thread type on the fracture properties of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion.
Cho IS; Kim TW; Ahn SJ; Yang IH; Baek SH
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 23216058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential of self-drilling orthodontic microimplants under immediate loading.
Chen Y; Lee JW; Cho WH; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):496-502. PubMed ID: 20362909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of stress in bone and microimplants during en-masse retraction of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth with different insertion angulations: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
Jasmine MI; Yezdani AA; Tajir F; Venu RM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jan; 141(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 22196187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimization Analysis of Two-Factor Continuous Variable between Thread Depth and Pitch of Microimplant under Toque Force.
Ye Y; Jiao J; Fan S; He J; Wang Y; Yao Q; Wang W; Li J; Chang S
Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():2119534. PubMed ID: 35770114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Insertion torque versus mechanical resistance of mini-implants inserted in different cortical thickness.
Santos RF; Ruellas AC; Fernandes DJ; Elias CN
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):90-4. PubMed ID: 25162571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strain of bone-implant interface and insertion torque regarding different miniscrew thread designs using an artificial bone model.
Cha JY; Hwang CJ; Kwon SH; Jung HS; Kim KM; Yu HS
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 25296728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
Chen Y; Kang ST; Bae SM; Kyung HM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Placement angle effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants and other factors with cone-beam computed tomography.
Jung YR; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Lee EH; Chang NY; Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Feb; 143(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 23374923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Effect of bicortical orthodontic microimplant on tooth movement in dogs].
Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Sep; 35(5):491-5. PubMed ID: 17063540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone density effects on the success rate of orthodontic microimplants evaluated with cone-beam computed tomography.
Lee MY; Park JH; Kim SC; Kang KH; Cho JH; Cho JW; Chang NY; Chae JM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 26827978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphological evaluation of the active tip of six types of orthodontic mini-implants.
Kitahara-Céia FM; Assad-Loss TF; Mucha JN; Elias CN
Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):36-41. PubMed ID: 23916430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term evaluation of factors affecting removal torque of microimplants.
Kim HJ; Park HS
Prog Orthod; 2021 Nov; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 34778924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
