These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25286340)

  • 21. Horizontal pull-out strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implant: an in vitro study.
    Chen CM; Wu JH; Lu PC; Wang HC; Lee HE; Wang CH; Du JK
    Implant Dent; 2011 Apr; 20(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 21448023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vitro evaluation of insertion and removal torques of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pithon MM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 40(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 21050721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of thread shape on the pullout strength of miniscrews.
    Gracco A; Giagnorio C; Incerti Parenti S; Alessandri Bonetti G; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):186-90. PubMed ID: 22858327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical effectiveness of cortical bone thickness on orthodontic microimplant stability: an evaluation based on the load share between cortical and cancellous bone.
    Alrbata RH; Yu W; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 25085300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fracture strength of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Assad-Loss TF; Kitahara-Céia FMF; Silveira GS; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(3):47-54. PubMed ID: 28746487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bicortical microimplant with 2 anchorage heads for mesial movement of posterior tooth in the beagle dog.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17826604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability and success rate of dual-thread miniscrews.
    Lee Y; Choi SH; Yu HS; Erenebat T; Liu J; Cha JY
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jul; 91(4):509-514. PubMed ID: 34181723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biologic evaluation of a hollow-type miniscrew implant: an experimental study in beagles.
    Youn JW; Cha JY; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):626-37. PubMed ID: 24785927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cortical bone strains around straight and angulated immediate orthodontic microimplants: a pilot study.
    Cehreli S; Yilmaz A; Arman-Ozcirpici A
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 23446437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mechanical influence of thread pitch on orthodontic mini-implant stability.
    Cunha AC; Freitas AO; Marquezan M; Nojima LI
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 19705930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peak insertion torque values of five mini-implant systems under different insertion loads.
    Quraishi E; Sherriff M; Bister D
    J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 24521745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dynamic simulation of the self-tapping insertion process of orthodontic microimplants into cortical bone with a 3-dimensional finite element method.
    Yu W; Park HS; Kyung HM; Kwon OW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Dec; 142(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 23195369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The relationship between the stability of microimplants and factors of gender and age].
    Ji GP; Yu Q; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Aug; 17(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 18784874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal force magnitude loaded to orthodontic microimplants: A finite element analysis.
    Alrbata RH; Momani MQ; Al-Tarawneh AM; Ihyasat A
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 26098865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs.
    Cha JY; Takano-Yamamoto T; Hwang CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):777-83. PubMed ID: 20657874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mechanical strength of orthodontic infrazygomatic mini-implants.
    Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Hsu KR; Wang HC; Chen CM
    Odontology; 2011 Jan; 99(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 21271334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of antibiotic prophylaxis on the stability of orthodontic microimplants: A pilot randomized controlled trial.
    Łyczek J; Kawala B; Antoszewska-Smith J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):621-631. PubMed ID: 29706210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of optimal length and insertion torque for miniscrews.
    Suzuki M; Deguchi T; Watanabe H; Seiryu M; Iikubo M; Sasano T; Fujiyama K; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 23910206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.