110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25287025)
1. Sonographic breast pattern in women in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Obajimi MO; Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT; Adedokun BO; Soyemi TO; Bassey OS
Ann Afr Med; 2014; 13(4):145-50. PubMed ID: 25287025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic breast pattern in Nigerian women in Ibadan, Nigeria.
Obajimi MO; Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT; Oluwasola AO; Adedokun BO; Soyemi TO; Olopade F; Newstead G
Breast Dis; 2011; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 21778578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pregnancy related breast diseases in a developing African country: Initial Sonographic Evaluation.
Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT; Obajimi GO; Obajimi MO
Pan Afr Med J; 2015; 20():239. PubMed ID: 27386035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of age on PPV of sonographic BI-RADS categories 3, 4, and 5.
Fu CY; Hsu HH; Yu JC; Hsu GC; Hsu KF; Chan DC; Ku CH; Lu TC; Chu CH
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Jan; 32 Suppl 1():S8-13. PubMed ID: 20603785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic parasitic calcifications in South West Nigeria: prospective and descriptive study.
Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT; Obajimi MO; Oluwasola AO; Soyemi TO
Pan Afr Med J; 2013; 15():126. PubMed ID: 24255732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New York State Breast Density Mandate: Follow-up Data With Screening Sonography.
Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Dec; 36(12):2511-2517. PubMed ID: 28656638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of the Gail model, body mass index and SNPs to predict breast cancer among women with abnormal (BI-RADS 4) mammograms.
McCarthy AM; Keller B; Kontos D; Boghossian L; McGuire E; Bristol M; Chen J; Domchek S; Armstrong K
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 25567532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Solid breast mass characterisation: use of the sonographic BI-RADS classification.
Costantini M; Belli P; Ierardi C; Franceschini G; La Torre G; Bonomo L
Radiol Med; 2007 Sep; 112(6):877-94. PubMed ID: 17885742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Background echotexture classification in breast ultrasound: inter-observer agreement study.
Kim WH; Lee SH; Chang JM; Cho N; Moon WK
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 28273746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tailored breast cancer screening program with microdose mammography, US, and MR Imaging: short-term results of a pilot study in 40-49-year-old women.
Venturini E; Losio C; Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; Fedele I; Tacchini S; Schiani E; Ravelli S; Cristel G; Panzeri MM; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2013 Aug; 268(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 23579052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Sonographic features and diagnostic analysis of breast granulomatous diseases: a report of 32 cases].
Lü JH; Lou HY; Ma MM; Fang H; Lin S; Xu HS; Shou JD
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 93(32):2581-3. PubMed ID: 24351602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A longitudinal study of the prevalence and characteristics of breast disorders detected by clinical breast examination during pregnancy and six months postpartum in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria.
Odedina SO; Ajayi IO; Adeniji-Sofoluwe A; Morhason-Bello IO; Huo D; Olopade OI; Ojengbede OA
BMC Womens Health; 2018 Sep; 18(1):152. PubMed ID: 30231883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted Ultrasound of an Indeterminate Breast Lesion on Mammography: When Does It Influence Management?
Sohail S; Masroor I; Afzal S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Aug; 25(8):564-7. PubMed ID: 26305300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonographic Evaluation of Nigerian Women with Mammographic Focal Asymmetric Density.
Itanyi DU; Ibrahim H; Ka'alu WO
West Afr J Med; 2024 Mar; 41(3):233-237. PubMed ID: 38785292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The application value of BI-RADS lexicon and high-frequency CDFI scoring in differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast].
Yang M; Liu F; Gu XN; Cai YL; Wang YY; Zhou WJ
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 93(23):1833-5. PubMed ID: 24124721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
