These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25287766)

  • 1. Can media monitoring be a proxy for public opinion about technoscientific controversies? The case of the Italian public debate on nuclear power.
    Neresini F; Lorenzet A
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Feb; 25(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 25287766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fukushima effects in Germany? Changes in media coverage and public opinion on nuclear power.
    Arlt D; Wolling J
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Oct; 25(7):842-57. PubMed ID: 26060249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal voices in the media coverage of controversial health interventions: how do they contribute to the public understanding of science?
    Hivon M; Lehoux P; Denis JL; Rock M
    Public Underst Sci; 2010 Jan; 19(1):34-51. PubMed ID: 20533791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Front page or "buried" beneath the fold? Media coverage of carbon capture and storage.
    Boyd AD; Paveglio TB
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 May; 23(4):411-27. PubMed ID: 23825250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role played by stakeholders in the public debate that brought Italy out of the club of nuclear energy producers.
    Cantone MC; Sturloni G; Brunelli G
    Health Phys; 2007 Oct; 93(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 17846521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Media Content Analysis of Marijuana's Health Effects in News Coverage.
    Abraham A; Zhang AJ; Ahn R; Woodbridge A; Korenstein D; Keyhani S
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1438-1440. PubMed ID: 29845473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
    Post S
    Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 24583579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information Sources as Explanatory Variables for the Belgian Health-Related Risk Perception of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Vyncke B; Perko T; Van Gorp B
    Risk Anal; 2017 Mar; 37(3):570-582. PubMed ID: 27322693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comment on "the role played by stakeholders in the public debate that brought Italy out of the club of nuclear energy producers".
    Cigna AA
    Health Phys; 2008 May; 94(5):484-5; author reply 485. PubMed ID: 18403970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research and scientists, the media and the disabled, politicians and judges, actual real treatments and possible false hopes: a PRM perspective on the Italian Stamina Foundation case.
    Negrini S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2013 Dec; 49(6):761-3. PubMed ID: 24522000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New threats to academic freedom.
    Minerva F
    Bioethics; 2014 May; 28(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 24602125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social media & stem cell science: examining the discourse.
    Adams A; Lomax G; Santarini A
    Regen Med; 2011 Nov; 6(6 Suppl):121-4. PubMed ID: 21999274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Knight in shining armour" or "Frankenstein's creation"? The coverage of synthetic biology in German-language media.
    Gschmeidler B; Seiringer A
    Public Underst Sci; 2012 Feb; 21(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 22586842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The media and the public opinion on genetics and biotechnology: mirrors, windows, or walls?
    Ten Eyck TA
    Public Underst Sci; 2005 Jul; 14(3):305-16. PubMed ID: 16240543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Risk communication in construction of new nuclear power plant].
    He GZ; Lü YL
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Mar; 34(3):1218-24. PubMed ID: 23745437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nuclear power debate and public opinion in Belarus: From Chernobyl to Ostrovets.
    Novikau A
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Apr; 26(3):275-288. PubMed ID: 27154754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ups and downs of stem cell research: the impact of policy uncertainty.
    Marzotto T; Alt PM
    J Health Hum Serv Adm; 2012; 35(3):331-51. PubMed ID: 23293807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Changes in the Factors Influencing Public Acceptance of Nuclear Power Generation in Japan Since the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster.
    Tsujikawa N; Tsuchida S; Shiotani T
    Risk Anal; 2016 Jan; 36(1):98-113. PubMed ID: 26224041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disputed climate science in the media: do countries matter?
    Grundmann R; Scott M
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Feb; 23(2):220-35. PubMed ID: 23825269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taking charge. NPs strategize in the face of opposition.
    Lebo S
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2007 Dec; 15(12):43-4. PubMed ID: 20014673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.