138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25288047)
1. Influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee on quality of life, balance confidence, and measures of mobility: a randomised cross-over trial.
Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Olsman J; Rietman JS
Clin Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 29(6):581-91. PubMed ID: 25288047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee across varying walking speeds: A randomized cross-over trial.
Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Sveinsdóttir HS; Prins MR; van der Meer F; Koopman HFJM; Rietman JS
Gait Posture; 2017 Jan; 51():254-260. PubMed ID: 27838569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancement of a prosthetic knee with a microprocessor-controlled gait phase switch reduces falls and improves balance confidence and gait speed in community ambulators with unilateral transfemoral amputation.
Fuenzalida Squella SA; Kannenberg A; Brandão Benetti Â
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Apr; 42(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 28691574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physical performance and self-report outcomes associated with use of passive, adaptive, and active prosthetic knees in persons with unilateral, transfemoral amputation: Randomized crossover trial.
Hafner BJ; Askew RL
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(6):677-700. PubMed ID: 26560243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of a stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on level walking in lower functioning individuals with a transfemoral amputation.
Eberly VJ; Mulroy SJ; Gronley JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Burnfield JM
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 24135259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between the C-leg microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee and non-microprocessor control prosthetic knees: a preliminary study of energy expenditure, obstacle course performance, and quality of life survey.
Seymour R; Engbretson B; Kott K; Ordway N; Brooks G; Crannell J; Hickernell E; Wheeler K
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 17365885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Immediate effects of a new microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joint: a comparative biomechanical evaluation.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Ludwigs E; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Mar; 93(3):541-9. PubMed ID: 22373937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee.
Hafner BJ; Willingham LL; Buell NC; Allyn KJ; Smith DG
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):207-17. PubMed ID: 17270519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Functional added value of microprocessor-controlled knee joints in daily life performance of Medicare Functional Classification Level-2 amputees.
Theeven P; Hemmen B; Rings F; Meys G; Brink P; Smeets R; Seelen H
J Rehabil Med; 2011 Oct; 43(10):906-15. PubMed ID: 21947182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gait and balance of transfemoral amputees using passive mechanical and microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees.
Kaufman KR; Levine JA; Brey RH; Iverson BK; McCrady SK; Padgett DJ; Joyner MJ
Gait Posture; 2007 Oct; 26(4):489-93. PubMed ID: 17869114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of a user-adaptive prosthetic knee on planned gait termination.
Prinsen EC; Nederhand MJ; Koopman BF; Rietman JS
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2017 Jul; 2017():1254-1259. PubMed ID: 28813993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of stance phase microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis on ramp negotiation and community walking function in K2 level transfemoral amputees.
Burnfield JM; Eberly VJ; Gronely JK; Perry J; Yule WJ; Mulroy SJ
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Mar; 36(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 22223685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative biomechanical analysis of current microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints.
Bellmann M; Schmalz T; Blumentritt S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Apr; 91(4):644-52. PubMed ID: 20382300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical function, gait, and dynamic balance of transfemoral amputees using two mechanical passive prosthetic knee devices.
Lythgo N; Marmaras B; Connor H
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 Oct; 91(10):1565-70. PubMed ID: 20875515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mobility and satisfaction with a microprocessor-controlled knee in moderately active amputees: A multi-centric randomized crossover trial.
Lansade C; Vicaut E; Paysant J; Ménager D; Cristina MC; Braatz F; Domayer S; Pérennou D; Chiesa G
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Sep; 61(5):278-285. PubMed ID: 29753888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative biomechanical evaluation of two technologically different microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee joints in safety-relevant daily-life situations.
Bellmann M; Köhler TM; Schmalz T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2019 Aug; 64(4):407-420. PubMed ID: 30540556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of Nintendo Wii Fit™ in the rehabilitation of outpatients following total knee replacement: a preliminary randomised controlled trial.
Fung V; Ho A; Shaffer J; Chung E; Gomez M
Physiotherapy; 2012 Sep; 98(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 22898573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does having a computerized prosthetic knee influence cognitive performance during amputee walking?
Williams RM; Turner AP; Orendurff M; Segal AD; Klute GK; Pecoraro J; Czerniecki J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 87(7):989-94. PubMed ID: 16813788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Physiological parameters analysis of transfemoral amputees with different prosthetic knees.
Li S; Cao W; Yu H; Meng Q; Chen W
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2019; 21(3):135-142. PubMed ID: 31798017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microprocessor Controlled Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis (KAFO) vs Stance Control vs Locked KAFO: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Deems-Dluhy S; Hoppe-Ludwig S; Mummidisetty CK; Semik P; Heinemann AW; Jayaraman A
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2021 Feb; 102(2):233-244. PubMed ID: 32976844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
