546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25288624)
1. Transtibial versus tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: long-term follow-up study.
Song EK; Park HW; Ahn YS; Seon JK
Am J Sports Med; 2014 Dec; 42(12):2964-71. PubMed ID: 25288624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Shin YS; Kim HJ; Lee DH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1239-1248. PubMed ID: 27896678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.
Cooper DE; Stewart D
Am J Sports Med; 2004 Mar; 32(2):346-60. PubMed ID: 14977658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up.
MacGillivray JD; Stein BE; Park M; Allen AA; Wickiewicz TL; Warren RF
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):320-8. PubMed ID: 16517317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
Garofalo R; Jolles BM; Moretti B; Siegrist O
Arthroscopy; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1331-1338.e1. PubMed ID: 17157733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via tibial inlay technique in multiligament knee injuries.
Zehir S; Elmalı N; Şahin E; Çalbıyık M; Karakaplan M; Taşdemir Z
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 26511682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries: a clinical comparison of the transtibial and tibial inlay techniques.
Seon JK; Song EK
Arthroscopy; 2006 Jan; 22(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16399457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical comparison of conventional and remnant-preserving transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with posterolateral corner reconstruction.
Kim SJ; Kim SH; Chun YM; Hwang BY; Choi DH; Yoon JY
Am J Sports Med; 2012 Mar; 40(3):640-9. PubMed ID: 22109544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. No difference in subjective and objective clinical outcomes between arthroscopic transtibial and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques in the treatment of multi-ligamentous knee injuries.
Zhang J; Zhang H; Zhang Z; Zheng T; Li Y
Knee; 2021 Jun; 30():18-25. PubMed ID: 33813104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical results of arthroscopic single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.
Kim YM; Lee CA; Matava MJ
Am J Sports Med; 2011 Feb; 39(2):425-34. PubMed ID: 20702860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Transtibial or Tibial Inlay Techniques: A Meta-analysis of Biomechanical and Clinical Outcomes.
Lee DY; Kim DH; Kim HJ; Ahn HS; Lee TH; Hwang SC
Am J Sports Med; 2018 Sep; 46(11):2789-2797. PubMed ID: 29328888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?
Weber AE; Bissell B; Wojtys EM; Sekiya JK
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Sep; 472(9):2667-79. PubMed ID: 25048278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tensioning of remnant posterior cruciate ligament and reconstruction of anterolateral bundle in chronic posterior cruciate ligament injury.
Jung YB; Jung HJ; Tae SK; Lee YS; Yang DL
Arthroscopy; 2006 Mar; 22(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 16517318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combined anterior cruciate ligament, posterior cruciate ligament, and posterolateral corner reconstruction with autogenous hamstring grafts in chronic instabilities.
Strobel MJ; Schulz MS; Petersen WJ; Eichhorn HJ
Arthroscopy; 2006 Feb; 22(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 16458804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcome of isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at mean 6.3-year follow up: a consecutive case series.
Rauck RC; Nwachukwu BU; Allen AA; Warren RF; Altchek DW; Williams RJ
Phys Sportsmed; 2019 Feb; 47(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 30212275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft--clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Ahn JH; Yoo JC; Wang JH
Arthroscopy; 2005 Aug; 21(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16084294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of hamstring tendon autograft and tibialis anterior allograft in arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Li B; Wang JS; He M; Wang GB; Shen P; Bai LH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Oct; 23(10):3077-84. PubMed ID: 25193568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Open tibial inlay versus arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
Panchal HB; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2011 Sep; 27(9):1289-95. PubMed ID: 21831568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Arthroscopic All-Inside Tibial-Inlay Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Medium-Term Functional Results and Complication Rate.
Osti M; Hierzer D; Seibert FJ; Benedetto KP
J Knee Surg; 2017 Mar; 30(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 27206067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral-tunnel techniques.
Stannard JP; Riley RS; Sheils TM; McGwin G; Volgas DA
Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 12642252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
