These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25289185)

  • 21. A Comparison of Variant Calling Pipelines Using Genome in a Bottle as a Reference.
    Cornish A; Guda C
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():456479. PubMed ID: 26539496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.
    Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
    Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. RIG: Recalibration and interrelation of genomic sequence data with the GATK.
    McCormick RF; Truong SK; Mullet JE
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Feb; 5(4):655-65. PubMed ID: 25681258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
    Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
    Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation and optimisation of indel detection workflows for ion torrent sequencing of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
    Yeo ZX; Wong JC; Rozen SG; Lee AS
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jun; 15(1):516. PubMed ID: 24962530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The GATK joint genotyping workflow is appropriate for calling variants in RNA-seq experiments.
    Brouard JS; Schenkel F; Marete A; Bissonnette N
    J Anim Sci Biotechnol; 2019; 10():44. PubMed ID: 31249686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The evaluation of Bcftools mpileup and GATK HaplotypeCaller for variant calling in non-human species.
    Lefouili M; Nam K
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):11331. PubMed ID: 35790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance evaluation of indel calling tools using real short-read data.
    Hasan MS; Wu X; Zhang L
    Hum Genomics; 2015 Aug; 9(1):20. PubMed ID: 26286629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
    Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An optimized GATK4 pipeline for Plasmodium falciparum whole genome sequencing variant calling and analysis.
    Niaré K; Greenhouse B; Bailey JA
    Malar J; 2023 Jul; 22(1):207. PubMed ID: 37420214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimized detection of insertions/deletions (INDELs) in whole-exome sequencing data.
    Kim BY; Park JH; Jo HY; Koo SK; Park MH
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182272. PubMed ID: 28792971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A hybrid computational strategy to address WGS variant analysis in >5000 samples.
    Huang Z; Rustagi N; Veeraraghavan N; Carroll A; Gibbs R; Boerwinkle E; Venkata MG; Yu F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):361. PubMed ID: 27612449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. SNP-SVant: A Computational Workflow to Predict and Annotate Genomic Variants in Organisms Lacking Benchmarked Variants.
    Gunasekaran D; Ardell DH; Nobile CJ
    Curr Protoc; 2024 May; 4(5):e1046. PubMed ID: 38717471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance assessment of variant calling pipelines using human whole exome sequencing and simulated data.
    Kumaran M; Subramanian U; Devarajan B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):342. PubMed ID: 31208315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparing a few SNP calling algorithms using low-coverage sequencing data.
    Yu X; Sun S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24044377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Halvade somatic: Somatic variant calling with Apache Spark.
    Decap D; de Schaetzen van Brienen L; Larmuseau M; Costanza P; Herzeel C; Wuyts R; Marchal K; Fostier J
    Gigascience; 2022 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 35022699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Making the most of RNA-seq: Pre-processing sequencing data with Opossum for reliable SNP variant detection.
    Oikkonen L; Lise S
    Wellcome Open Res; 2017 Jan; 2():6. PubMed ID: 28239666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.