These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25289185)

  • 41. An Optimized GATK4 Pipeline for Plasmodium falciparum Whole Genome Sequencing Variant Calling and Analysis.
    Niaré K; Greenhouse B; Bailey JA
    Res Sq; 2023 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 36824880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of INDEL Calling Tools with Simulation Data and Real Short-Read Data.
    Li D; Kim W; Wang L; Yoon KA; Park B; Park C; Kong SY; Hwang Y; Baek D; Lee ES; Won S
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(5):1635-1644. PubMed ID: 30004886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Optimized pipeline of MuTect and GATK tools to improve the detection of somatic single nucleotide polymorphisms in whole-exome sequencing data.
    do Valle ÍF; Giampieri E; Simonetti G; Padella A; Manfrini M; Ferrari A; Papayannidis C; Zironi I; Garonzi M; Bernardi S; Delledonne M; Martinelli G; Remondini D; Castellani G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(Suppl 12):341. PubMed ID: 28185561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. ICR142 Benchmarker: evaluating, optimising and benchmarking variant calling performance using the ICR142 NGS validation series.
    Ruark E; Holt E; Renwick A; Münz M; Wakeling M; Ellard S; Mahamdallie S; Yost S; Rahman N
    Wellcome Open Res; 2018; 3():108. PubMed ID: 30483600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Steps to ensure accuracy in genotype and SNP calling from Illumina sequencing data.
    Liu Q; Guo Y; Li J; Long J; Zhang B; Shyr Y
    BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):S8. PubMed ID: 23281772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. FVC as an adaptive and accurate method for filtering variants from popular NGS analysis pipelines.
    Ren Y; Kong Y; Zhou X; Genchev GZ; Zhou C; Zhao H; Lu H
    Commun Biol; 2022 Sep; 5(1):975. PubMed ID: 36114280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. 16GT: a fast and sensitive variant caller using a 16-genotype probabilistic model.
    Luo R; Schatz MC; Salzberg SL
    Gigascience; 2017 Jul; 6(7):1-4. PubMed ID: 28637275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A study on fast calling variants from next-generation sequencing data using decision tree.
    Li Z; Wang Y; Wang F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 29673316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Calling known variants and identifying new variants while rapidly aligning sequence data.
    VanRaden PM; Bickhart DM; O'Connell JR
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3216-3229. PubMed ID: 30772032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. BAYSIC: a Bayesian method for combining sets of genome variants with improved specificity and sensitivity.
    Cantarel BL; Weaver D; McNeill N; Zhang J; Mackey AJ; Reese J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():104. PubMed ID: 24725768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluating Variant Calling Tools for Non-Matched Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
    Sandmann S; de Graaf AO; Karimi M; van der Reijden BA; Hellström-Lindberg E; Jansen JH; Dugas M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43169. PubMed ID: 28233799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Read trimming has minimal effect on bacterial SNP-calling accuracy.
    Bush SJ
    Microb Genom; 2020 Dec; 6(12):. PubMed ID: 33332257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of an optimized germline exomes pipeline using BWA-MEM2 and Dragen-GATK tools.
    Alganmi N; Abusamra H
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(8):e0288371. PubMed ID: 37535628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Using whole genome sequence to compare variant callers and breed differences of US sheep.
    Stegemiller MR; Redden RR; Notter DR; Taylor T; Taylor JB; Cockett NE; Heaton MP; Kalbfleisch TS; Murdoch BM
    Front Genet; 2022; 13():1060882. PubMed ID: 36685812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Multiple Variant Calling Pipelines in Wheat Whole Exome Sequencing.
    Cagirici HB; Akpinar BA; Sen TZ; Budak H
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Sep; 22(19):. PubMed ID: 34638743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of Read Mapping and Variant Calling Tools for the Analysis of Plant NGS Data.
    Schilbert HM; Rempel A; Pucker B
    Plants (Basel); 2020 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32252268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparing genomic variant identification protocols for
    Li X; Muñoz JF; Gade L; Argimon S; Bougnoux ME; Bowers JR; Chow NA; Cuesta I; Farrer RA; Maufrais C; Monroy-Nieto J; Pradhan D; Uehling J; Vu D; Yeats CA; Aanensen DM; d'Enfert C; Engelthaler DM; Eyre DW; Fisher MC; Hagen F; Meyer W; Singh G; Alastruey-Izquierdo A; Litvintseva AP; Cuomo CA
    Microb Genom; 2023 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 37043380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Sharing genetic variants with the NGS pipeline is essential for effective genomic data sharing and reproducibility in health information exchange.
    Lee JH; Kweon S; Park YR
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2268. PubMed ID: 33500538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison among three variant callers and assessment of the accuracy of imputation from SNP array data to whole-genome sequence level in chicken.
    Ni G; Strom TM; Pausch H; Reimer C; Preisinger R; Simianer H; Erbe M
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():824. PubMed ID: 26486989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.