109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25290285)
1. Photoelastic stress analysis of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by 3 dental implants.
Simamoto Júnior PC; da Silva-Neto JP; Novais VR; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; das Neves FD; Araujo CA
Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):704-9. PubMed ID: 25290285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short implants to support mandibular complete dentures - photoelastic analysis.
Pimentel MJ; Silva WJ; Del Bel Cury AA
Braz Oral Res; 2017 Feb; 31():e18. PubMed ID: 28273197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Stress distribution after installation of fixed frameworks with marginal gaps over angled and parallel implants: a photoelastic analysis.
Markarian RA; Ueda C; Sendyk CL; Laganá DC; Souza RM
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 17362421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on stress around single short-wide implants: a photoelastic stress analysis.
Sotto-Maior BS; Senna PM; da Silva-Neto JP; de Arruda Nóbilo MA; Del Bel Cury AA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Jan; 24(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 24919655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept.
Wang Q; Zhang ZZ; Bai SZ; Zhang SF
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):469. PubMed ID: 36335327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations.
Yu W; Li X; Ma X; Xu X
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):783.e1-783.e10. PubMed ID: 35305832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of influence of different implant size and placement on stress distribution with 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
Balkaya MC
Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):716-22. PubMed ID: 25290280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of two full-arch rehabilitations supported by four or five implants.
Francetti L; Cavalli N; Villa T; La Barbera L; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Del Fabbro M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 25830403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
Kökat AM; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Akkocaoğlu M; Akça K; Cehreli MC
Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 19359867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
J Oral Rehabil; 2002 Apr; 29(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 11966968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photoelastic stress analysis in mandibular bone surrounding bar-clip overdenture implants.
Pigozzo MN; Laganá DC; Sesma N; Souza GF; Ichi AL
Braz Oral Res; 2014; 28():. PubMed ID: 24878673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading.
das Neves FD; Verissimo AG; da Silva Neto JP; do Prado CJ; de Araújo CA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 23377080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between vertical misfits and stresses transmitted to implants from metal frameworks.
de Torres EM; Barbosa GA; Bernardes SR; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1735-9. PubMed ID: 21497352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
