BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2529031)

  • 1. [Differences in patient sensitivity to currently used non-depolarized curaremimetics and factors which affect it].
    Strnad J; Honců E
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1989 Aug; 128(32):1002-5. PubMed ID: 2529031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Methods of determining clinically sufficient decurarization and its evaluation].
    Strnad J; Strickerová E; Honců E
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1990 Jun; 129(25):792-5. PubMed ID: 2168290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Neuromuscular monitoring in a patient with hemiparesis. Resistance of the paralysed musculature to non-depolarising muscle relaxants].
    Müller R; Knüttgen D; Vorweg M; Doehn M
    Anaesthesist; 2002 Aug; 51(8):644-9. PubMed ID: 12391524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cumulative properties of three new nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs BW A444U, atracurium and vecuronium.
    Ali HH; Savarese JJ; Basta SJ; Sunder N; Gionfriddo M
    Br J Anaesth; 1983; 55 Suppl 1():107S-111S. PubMed ID: 6134539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Testing of neuromuscular function during anaesthesia (author's transl)].
    Chraemmer-Jørgensen B; Hicquet J; Howardy-Hansen P; Ording H; Viby-Mogensen J
    Anesth Analg (Paris); 1980; 37(3-4):113-9. PubMed ID: 6445701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tetanic fade following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs.
    Gibson FM; Mirakhur RK
    Anesth Analg; 1989 Jun; 68(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 2567584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons of the dose-response and recovery time course of vecuronium and atracurium in anesthetized chinese adult patients.
    Xue FS; Li P; Liao X; Li CW; Xu YC; Liu Y; Liu KP; Sun HT
    Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2007 Mar; 45(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17424753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antagonism of profound cisatracurium and rocuronium block: the role of objective assessment of neuromuscular function.
    Kopman AF; Kopman DJ; Ng J; Zank LM
    J Clin Anesth; 2005 Feb; 17(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15721727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A comparison between neuromuscular blocking effects of pipecuronium and vecuronium; a double blind controlled study in collaboration with 5 departments of anesthesiology].
    Suzuki H; Hashimoto Y; Hanaoka K; Amaki Y; Kobayashi T; Yamamura H
    Masui; 1994 Oct; 43(10):1583-9. PubMed ID: 7815711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Resistance to non-depolarizing myorelaxants. Our experience with 3 clinical cases].
    Barbone G; Longo G; Traversa M; Bruno F
    Minerva Anestesiol; 1992 Sep; 58(9):557-61. PubMed ID: 1436565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of atracurium, pipecuronium, and vecuronium for tracheal intubation.
    Cozanitis DA; Hofmockel R; Benad G; Sitarek U
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1987; 38(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 2884796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mechanomyography and electromyography--2 competing methods of relaxometry using vecuronium].
    Mellinghoff H; Diefenbach C; Arhelger S; Buzello W
    Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 2565693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of neuromuscular block of atracurium and rocuronium in adults.
    Hans P; Brichant JF; Franzen A; Faleres X; Lamy M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1996; 47(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8869671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing the profile of onset of relaxation.
    De Mey JC; De Laat M
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1997; 48(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 9099302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative recovery of 50-Hz and 100-Hz posttetanic twitch following profound neuromuscular block.
    Fernandes LA; Stout RG; Silverman DG; Brull SJ
    J Clin Anesth; 1997 Feb; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 9051546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.
    Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Horiuchi T; Inoue S; Nakase H; Sakaki T; Furuya H
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):930-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rocuronium- and mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block and intubating conditions: a comparison with vecuronium.
    van den Broek L; Hommes FD; Nap HJ; Wierda JM
    Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 11():27-30. PubMed ID: 8557002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sevoflurane increases fade of neuromuscular response to TOF stimulation following rocuronium administration in children. A PK/PD analysis.
    Woloszczuk-Gebicka B; Wyska E; Grabowski T
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Jul; 17(7):637-46. PubMed ID: 17564645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does repetition of post-tetanic count every 3 min during profound relaxation affect accelerographic recovery of atracurium blockade?
    Motamed C; Kirov K; Combes X; Duvaldestin P
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Jul; 49(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 15954964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interference between muscle relaxation and facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy.
    Thiede O; Klüsener T; Sielenkämper A; Van Aken H; Stoll W; Schmäl F
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 126(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 16608797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.