44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2529031)
1. [Differences in patient sensitivity to currently used non-depolarized curaremimetics and factors which affect it].
Strnad J; Honců E
Cas Lek Cesk; 1989 Aug; 128(32):1002-5. PubMed ID: 2529031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Methods of determining clinically sufficient decurarization and its evaluation].
Strnad J; Strickerová E; Honců E
Cas Lek Cesk; 1990 Jun; 129(25):792-5. PubMed ID: 2168290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Neuromuscular monitoring in a patient with hemiparesis. Resistance of the paralysed musculature to non-depolarising muscle relaxants].
Müller R; Knüttgen D; Vorweg M; Doehn M
Anaesthesist; 2002 Aug; 51(8):644-9. PubMed ID: 12391524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cumulative properties of three new nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs BW A444U, atracurium and vecuronium.
Ali HH; Savarese JJ; Basta SJ; Sunder N; Gionfriddo M
Br J Anaesth; 1983; 55 Suppl 1():107S-111S. PubMed ID: 6134539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Testing of neuromuscular function during anaesthesia (author's transl)].
Chraemmer-Jørgensen B; Hicquet J; Howardy-Hansen P; Ording H; Viby-Mogensen J
Anesth Analg (Paris); 1980; 37(3-4):113-9. PubMed ID: 6445701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tetanic fade following administration of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drugs.
Gibson FM; Mirakhur RK
Anesth Analg; 1989 Jun; 68(6):759-62. PubMed ID: 2567584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of the dose-response and recovery time course of vecuronium and atracurium in anesthetized chinese adult patients.
Xue FS; Li P; Liao X; Li CW; Xu YC; Liu Y; Liu KP; Sun HT
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2007 Mar; 45(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 17424753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Antagonism of profound cisatracurium and rocuronium block: the role of objective assessment of neuromuscular function.
Kopman AF; Kopman DJ; Ng J; Zank LM
J Clin Anesth; 2005 Feb; 17(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15721727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [A comparison between neuromuscular blocking effects of pipecuronium and vecuronium; a double blind controlled study in collaboration with 5 departments of anesthesiology].
Suzuki H; Hashimoto Y; Hanaoka K; Amaki Y; Kobayashi T; Yamamura H
Masui; 1994 Oct; 43(10):1583-9. PubMed ID: 7815711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Resistance to non-depolarizing myorelaxants. Our experience with 3 clinical cases].
Barbone G; Longo G; Traversa M; Bruno F
Minerva Anestesiol; 1992 Sep; 58(9):557-61. PubMed ID: 1436565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of atracurium, pipecuronium, and vecuronium for tracheal intubation.
Cozanitis DA; Hofmockel R; Benad G; Sitarek U
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1987; 38(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 2884796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Mechanomyography and electromyography--2 competing methods of relaxometry using vecuronium].
Mellinghoff H; Diefenbach C; Arhelger S; Buzello W
Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 2565693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of neuromuscular block of atracurium and rocuronium in adults.
Hans P; Brichant JF; Franzen A; Faleres X; Lamy M
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1996; 47(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8869671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Factors influencing the profile of onset of relaxation.
De Mey JC; De Laat M
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 1997; 48(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 9099302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative recovery of 50-Hz and 100-Hz posttetanic twitch following profound neuromuscular block.
Fernandes LA; Stout RG; Silverman DG; Brull SJ
J Clin Anesth; 1997 Feb; 9(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 9051546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of the neuromuscular blockade levels on amplitudes of posttetanic motor-evoked potentials and movement in response to transcranial stimulation in patients receiving propofol and fentanyl anesthesia.
Yamamoto Y; Kawaguchi M; Hayashi H; Horiuchi T; Inoue S; Nakase H; Sakaki T; Furuya H
Anesth Analg; 2008 Mar; 106(3):930-4, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18292442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rocuronium- and mivacurium-induced neuromuscular block and intubating conditions: a comparison with vecuronium.
van den Broek L; Hommes FD; Nap HJ; Wierda JM
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 11():27-30. PubMed ID: 8557002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sevoflurane increases fade of neuromuscular response to TOF stimulation following rocuronium administration in children. A PK/PD analysis.
Woloszczuk-Gebicka B; Wyska E; Grabowski T
Paediatr Anaesth; 2007 Jul; 17(7):637-46. PubMed ID: 17564645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does repetition of post-tetanic count every 3 min during profound relaxation affect accelerographic recovery of atracurium blockade?
Motamed C; Kirov K; Combes X; Duvaldestin P
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Jul; 49(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 15954964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interference between muscle relaxation and facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy.
Thiede O; Klüsener T; Sielenkämper A; Van Aken H; Stoll W; Schmäl F
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Apr; 126(4):422-8. PubMed ID: 16608797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]