BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25290887)

  • 1. MEG source reconstruction based on identification of directed source interactions on whole-brain anatomical networks.
    Fukushima M; Yamashita O; Knösche TR; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():408-27. PubMed ID: 25290887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of hierarchical Bayesian method through retinotopic brain activities reconstruction from fMRI and MEG signals.
    Yoshioka T; Toyama K; Kawato M; Yamashita O; Nishina S; Yamagishi N; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 Oct; 42(4):1397-413. PubMed ID: 18620066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multivariate reconstruction of functional networks from cortical sources dynamics in MEG/EEG.
    Dossevi A; Cosmelli D; Garnero L; Ammari H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Aug; 55(8):2074-86. PubMed ID: 18632370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A hierarchical Bayesian method to resolve an inverse problem of MEG contaminated with eye movement artifacts.
    Fujiwara Y; Yamashita O; Kawawaki D; Doya K; Kawato M; Toyama K; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2009 Apr; 45(2):393-409. PubMed ID: 19150653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A state-space modeling approach for localization of focal current sources from MEG.
    Fukushima M; Yamashita O; Kanemura A; Ishii S; Kawato M; Sato MA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1561-71. PubMed ID: 22394573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multivariate autoregressive model constrained by anatomical connectivity to reconstruct focal sources.
    Belaoucha B; Kachouane M; Papadopoulo T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():4067-4070. PubMed ID: 28269176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Closely Spaced MEG Source Localization and Functional Connectivity Analysis Using a New Prewhitening Invariance of Noise Space Algorithm.
    Zhang J; Cui Y; Deng L; He L; Zhang J; Zhang J; Zhou Q; Liu Q; Zhang Z
    Neural Plast; 2016; 2016():4890497. PubMed ID: 26819768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG.
    David O; Kiebel SJ; Harrison LM; Mattout J; Kilner JM; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1255-72. PubMed ID: 16473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian MEG time courses with fMRI priors.
    Wang Y; Holland SK
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2022 Apr; 16(2):781-791. PubMed ID: 34561780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework.
    Mattout J; Phillips C; Penny WD; Rugg MD; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):753-67. PubMed ID: 16368248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconstruction of two-dimensional movement trajectories from selected magnetoencephalography cortical currents by combined sparse Bayesian methods.
    Toda A; Imamizu H; Kawato M; Sato MA
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jan; 54(2):892-905. PubMed ID: 20884361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A variational Bayes spatiotemporal model for electromagnetic brain mapping.
    Nathoo FS; Babul A; Moiseev A; Virji-Babul N; Beg MF
    Biometrics; 2014 Mar; 70(1):132-43. PubMed ID: 24354514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bayesian analysis of the neuromagnetic inverse problem with l(p)-norm priors.
    Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Hämäläinen MS; Jääskeläinen IP; Lampinen J; Vehtari A; Sams M
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(3):870-84. PubMed ID: 15955497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem.
    Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Kajihara S; Toyama K; Goda N; Doya K; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):806-26. PubMed ID: 15528082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a variational scheme for model inversion of multi-area model of brain. Part I: simulation evaluation.
    Babajani-Feremi A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Math Biosci; 2011 Jan; 229(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 21070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reconstructing spatially extended brain sources via enforcing multiple transform sparseness.
    Zhu M; Zhang W; Dickens DL; Ding L
    Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 86():280-93. PubMed ID: 24103850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A symmetric multivariate leakage correction for MEG connectomes.
    Colclough GL; Brookes MJ; Smith SM; Woolrich MW
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():439-48. PubMed ID: 25862259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wedge MUSIC: a novel approach to examine experimental differences of brain source connectivity patterns from EEG/MEG data.
    Ewald A; Avarvand FS; Nolte G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():610-24. PubMed ID: 25038442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.