479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25291754)
1. Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK.
Wang D; Liu M; Chen Y; Zhang X; Xu Y; Wang J; To CH; Liu Q
J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):702-7. PubMed ID: 25291754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis.
Wu D; Wang Y; Zhang L; Wei S; Tang X
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):954-62. PubMed ID: 24751146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
Li M; Zhou Z; Shen Y; Knorz MC; Gong L; Zhou X
J Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 30(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24763474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after Small incision lenticule extraction and Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis.
Li X; Wang Y; Dou R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):540-51. PubMed ID: 26087672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia.
Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y
J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vector analysis of astigmatic correction after small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond-assisted LASIK for low to moderate myopic astigmatism.
Chan TC; Ng AL; Cheng GP; Wang Z; Ye C; Woo VC; Tham CC; Jhanji V
Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 100(4):553-9. PubMed ID: 26206791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).
Sefat SM; Wiltfang R; Bechmann M; Mayer WJ; Kampik A; Kook D
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26554611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Corneal Densitometry after Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (Fs-LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).
Shajari M; Wanner E; Rusev V; Mir Mohi Sefat S; Mayer WJ; Kohnen T; Priglinger S; Kook D
Curr Eye Res; 2018 May; 43(5):605-610. PubMed ID: 29537886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Corneal Biological Healing After Femtosecond LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Procedure.
Xia L; Zhang J; Wu J; Yu K
Curr Eye Res; 2016 Sep; 41(9):1202-8. PubMed ID: 26833247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison Between Q-Adjusted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.
El-Mayah E; Anis M; Salem M; Pinero D; Hosny M
Eye Contact Lens; 2018 Nov; 44 Suppl 2():S426-S432. PubMed ID: 30024453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.
Liu M; Chen Y; Wang D; Zhou Y; Zhang X; He J; Zhang T; Sun Y; Liu Q
Cornea; 2016 Feb; 35(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 26684046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE).
Ryu IH; Kim BJ; Lee JH; Kim SW
J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):250-256. PubMed ID: 28407165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Topographic analysis of the centration of the treatment zone after SMILE for myopia and comparison to FS-LASIK: subjective versus objective alignment.
Lazaridis A; Droutsas K; Sekundo W
J Refract Surg; 2014 Oct; 30(10):680-6. PubMed ID: 25291751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK.
Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the Difference between Predicted and Measured Central Corneal Thickness Reduction after SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
Wu F; Yin H; Yang Y
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Aug; 46(8):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 33494622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study.
Agca A; Ozgurhan EB; Demirok A; Bozkurt E; Celik U; Ozkaya A; Cankaya I; Yilmaz OF
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Apr; 37(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 23830802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical Zone Centration Accuracy Using Corneal Fixation-based SMILE Compared to Eye Tracker-based Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK for Myopia.
Reinstein DZ; Gobbe M; Gobbe L; Archer TJ; Carp GI
J Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 31(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 26352563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of corneal shape changes and aberrations induced By FS-LASIK and SMILE for myopia.
Gyldenkerne A; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal JØ
J Refract Surg; 2015 Apr; 31(4):223-9. PubMed ID: 25751842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Forward Light Scatter Changes Between SMILE, Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK, and Epipolis LASIK: Results of a 1-Year Prospective Study.
Xu L; Wang Y; Li J; Liu Y; Wu W; Zhang H; Wu Y; Khan GA
J Refract Surg; 2015 Nov; 31(11):752-8. PubMed ID: 26544563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small incision lenticule extraction and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis.
Chen M; Yu M; Dai J
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 94(7):e586-e591. PubMed ID: 27130377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
