404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25291757)
1. Assessment of ocular biomechanics using dynamic ultra high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and normal eyes.
Tian L; Ko MW; Wang LK; Zhang JY; Li TJ; Huang YF; Zheng YP
J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):785-91. PubMed ID: 25291757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic Scheimpflug-based assessment of keratoconus and the effects of corneal cross-linking.
Bak-Nielsen S; Pedersen IB; Ivarsen A; Hjortdal J
J Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 30(6):408-14. PubMed ID: 24972407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Corneal Deformation Parameters in Keratoconic and Normal Eyes Using a Non-contact Tonometer With a Dynamic Ultra-High-Speed Scheimpflug Camera.
Mercer RN; Waring GO; Roberts CJ; Jhanji V; Wang Y; Filho JS; Hemings RA; Rocha KM
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):625-631. PubMed ID: 28880338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Corneal Dynamic and Tomographic Analysis in Normal, Forme Fruste Keratoconic, and Keratoconic Eyes.
Wang YM; Chan TCY; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2017 Sep; 33(9):632-638. PubMed ID: 28880339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Corneal biomechanical properties in keratoconic and normal eyes].
Wei SS; Li Y; Li J; Liu JG; Ye L; Wan YQ; Li J; Du J
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 52(9):669-73. PubMed ID: 27647247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical assessment of healthy and keratoconic corneas (with/without crosslinking) using dynamic ultrahigh-speed Scheimpflug technology and the relevance of the parameter (A1L-A2L).
Fuchsluger TA; Brettl S; Geerling G; Kaisers W; Franko Zeitz P
Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 103(4):558-564. PubMed ID: 29871966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Ability of Corneal Shape and Biomechanical Parameters for Detecting Frank Keratoconus.
Sedaghat MR; Momeni-Moghaddam H; Ambrósio R; Heidari HR; Maddah N; Danesh Z; Sabzi F
Cornea; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 29847493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.
Vinciguerra R; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Roberts CJ; Lopes B; Morenghi E; Azzolini C; Vinciguerra P
J Refract Surg; 2016 Dec; 32(12):803-810. PubMed ID: 27930790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of corneal biomechanical parameters in healthy and keratoconic eyes using dynamic bidirectional applanation device and dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer.
Herber R; Ramm L; Spoerl E; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Terai N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jun; 45(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30902432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical responses of healthy and keratoconic corneas measured using a noncontact scheimpflug-based tonometer.
Ali NQ; Patel DV; McGhee CN
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 May; 55(6):3651-9. PubMed ID: 24833745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal deformation response parameters of dynamic ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
Herber R; Vinciguerra R; Lopes B; Raiskup F; Pillunat LE; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2020 Jan; 46(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 32050237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Corneal Tomography and a New Combined Tomographic Biomechanical Index in Subclinical Keratoconus.
Chan TCY; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
J Refract Surg; 2018 Sep; 34(9):616-621. PubMed ID: 30199566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal Biomechanics in Unilateral Keratoconus and Fellow Eyes with a Scheimpflug-based Tonometer.
Catalán-López S; Cadarso-Suárez L; López-Ratón M; Cadarso-Suárez C
Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Jul; 95(7):608-615. PubMed ID: 29957740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Introduction of Two Novel Stiffness Parameters and Interpretation of Air Puff-Induced Biomechanical Deformation Parameters With a Dynamic Scheimpflug Analyzer.
Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Bons JP; Hossain A; Elsheikh A; Vinciguerra R; Vinciguerra P; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2017 Apr; 33(4):266-273. PubMed ID: 28407167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical Quality in Keratoconus Is Associated With Corneal Biomechanics.
Shugyo A; Koh S; Inoue R; Ambrósio R; Miki A; Maeda N; Nishida K
Cornea; 2021 Oct; 40(10):1276-1281. PubMed ID: 33332893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes of corneal biomechanics with keratoconus.
Wolffsohn JS; Safeen S; Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
Cornea; 2012 Aug; 31(8):849-54. PubMed ID: 22495031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.
Chan TC; Wang YM; Yu M; Jhanji V
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 28559422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhanced Combined Tomography and Biomechanics Data for Distinguishing Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Ramos I; Faria-Correia F; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
J Refract Surg; 2016 Jul; 32(7):479-94. PubMed ID: 27400080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
