These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25291805)

  • 21. Posterior weighted reinforcement learning with state uncertainty.
    Larsen T; Leslie DS; Collins EJ; Bogacz R
    Neural Comput; 2010 May; 22(5):1149-79. PubMed ID: 20100078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Efficient exploration through active learning for value function approximation in reinforcement learning.
    Akiyama T; Hachiya H; Sugiyama M
    Neural Netw; 2010 Jun; 23(5):639-48. PubMed ID: 20080026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.
    Kane JM; Leucht S; Carpenter D; Docherty JP;
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2003; 64 Suppl 12():5-19. PubMed ID: 14640142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Mathematical models of decision making and learning].
    Ito M; Doya K
    Brain Nerve; 2008 Jul; 60(7):791-8. PubMed ID: 18646619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A hierarchical bayesian model of human decision-making on an optimal stopping problem.
    Lee MD
    Cogn Sci; 2006 May; 30(3):1-26. PubMed ID: 21702820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What is optimal in optimal inference?
    Tavoni G; Balasubramanian V; Gold JI
    Curr Opin Behav Sci; 2019 Oct; 29():117-126. PubMed ID: 32832585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian clustering of flow cytometry data for the diagnosis of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
    Lakoumentas J; Drakos J; Karakantza M; Nikiforidis GC; Sakellaropoulos GC
    J Biomed Inform; 2009 Apr; 42(2):251-61. PubMed ID: 19084613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Online learning of shaping rewards in reinforcement learning.
    Grześ M; Kudenko D
    Neural Netw; 2010 May; 23(4):541-50. PubMed ID: 20116208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem.
    Sato MA; Yoshioka T; Kajihara S; Toyama K; Goda N; Doya K; Kawato M
    Neuroimage; 2004 Nov; 23(3):806-26. PubMed ID: 15528082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An empirical Bayesian solution to the source reconstruction problem in EEG.
    Phillips C; Mattout J; Rugg MD; Maquet P; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(4):997-1011. PubMed ID: 15670677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hierarchical reinforcement learning and decision making.
    Botvinick MM
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):956-62. PubMed ID: 22695048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of a statistics-based expert system to provide automated second opinions prior to elective surgery.
    Whittington R; Altschuler MD
    Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1993; 1(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 10171911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analyzing Sensor-Based Individual and Population Behavior Patterns via Inverse Reinforcement Learning.
    Lin B; Cook DJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32932643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hierarchical inverse Gaussian models and multiple testing: application to gene expression data.
    Labbe A; Thompson M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2005; 4():Article23. PubMed ID: 16646841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.
    Cruz-Ramírez M; Hervás-Martínez C; Fernández JC; Briceño J; de la Mata M
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 May; 58(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 23489761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ventral striatal control of appetitive motivation: role in ingestive behavior and reward-related learning.
    Kelley AE
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2004 Jan; 27(8):765-76. PubMed ID: 15019426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Simulation of rat behavior by a reinforcement learning algorithm in consideration of appearance probabilities of reinforcement signals.
    Murakoshi K; Noguchi T
    Biosystems; 2005 Apr; 80(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15740837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Elicitation of neurological knowledge with argument-based machine learning.
    Groznik V; Guid M; Sadikov A; Možina M; Georgiev D; Kragelj V; Ribarič S; Pirtošek Z; Bratko I
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Feb; 57(2):133-44. PubMed ID: 23063772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Policy Gradient From Demonstration and Curiosity.
    Chen J; Xu W
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2023 Aug; 53(8):4923-4933. PubMed ID: 35239497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Akt1 deficiency modulates reward learning and reward prediction error in mice.
    Chen YC; Chen YW; Hsu YF; Chang WT; Hsiao CK; Min MY; Lai WS
    Genes Brain Behav; 2012 Mar; 11(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 22151747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.