These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25292111)

  • 21. Pathogenicity of cell culture-derived and bursa-derived infectious bursal disease viruses in specific-pathogen-free chickens.
    Abdel-Alim GA; Saif YM
    Avian Dis; 2001; 45(4):844-52. PubMed ID: 11785889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of particulate air samplers for airborne aflatoxin B1.
    Silas JC; Harrison MA; Carpenter JA
    J Toxicol Environ Health; 1986; 18(2):215-20. PubMed ID: 3086563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sampling methodologies and dosage assessment techniques for submicrometre and ultrafine virus aerosol particles.
    Hogan CJ; Kettleson EM; Lee MH; Ramaswami B; Angenent LT; Biswas P
    J Appl Microbiol; 2005; 99(6):1422-34. PubMed ID: 16313415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Molecular comparison of the sampling efficiency of four types of airborne bacterial samplers.
    Li K
    Sci Total Environ; 2011 Nov; 409(24):5493-8. PubMed ID: 21968260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of SYBR green I based one-step real-time RT-PCR assay for the detection and differentiation of very virulent and classical strains of infectious bursal disease virus.
    Kong LL; Omar AR; Hair Bejo M; Ideris A; Tan SW
    J Virol Methods; 2009 Nov; 161(2):271-9. PubMed ID: 19591873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments.
    Haatainen S; Laitinen J; Linnainmaa M; Reponen T; Kalliokoski P
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19904652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of Four Aerobiological Sampling Methods for the Retrieval of Aerosolized Pseudomonas syringae.
    Buttner MP; Stetzenbach LD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 57(4):1268-70. PubMed ID: 16348468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inactivation of airborne Enterococcus faecalis and infectious bursal disease virus using a pilot-scale ultraviolet photocatalytic oxidation scrubber.
    Zhao Y; Aarnink AJ; Xin H
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Jan; 64(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 24620401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhanced detection of infectious airborne influenza virus.
    Blachere FM; Cao G; Lindsley WG; Noti JD; Beezhold DH
    J Virol Methods; 2011 Sep; 176(1-2):120-4. PubMed ID: 21663766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Air sampling of Aspergillus fumigatus and other thermotolerant fungi: comparative performance of the Sartorius MD8 airport and the Merck MAS-100 portable bioaerosol sampler.
    Engelhart S; Glasmacher A; Simon A; Exner M
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Dec; 210(6):733-739. PubMed ID: 17142101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.
    Mbareche H; Veillette M; Bilodeau GJ; Duchaine C
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 84(23):. PubMed ID: 30217848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of four bioaerosol samplers in the outdoor environment.
    Cage BR; Schreiber K; Barnes C; Portnoy J
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 1996 Nov; 77(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 8933779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of high-volume air sampling equipment for viral aerosol sampling during emergency response.
    Cooper C; Slagley J; Lohaus J; Escamilla E; Bliss C; Semler D; Felker D; Smith D; Ott D
    J Emerg Manag; 2014; 12(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 24828912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of sampling duration on recovery of culturable fungi using the Andersen N6 and RCS bioaerosol samplers.
    Saldanha R; Manno M; Saleh M; Ewaze JO; Scott JA
    Indoor Air; 2008 Dec; 18(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 18761682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the commercial bacterial air samplers by the new bacterial aerosol generator.
    Furuhashi M; Miyamae T
    Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ; 1981 Mar; 28(1):7-21. PubMed ID: 7011587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gentle Sampling of Submicrometer Airborne Virus Particles using a Personal Electrostatic Particle Concentrator.
    Hong S; Bhardwaj J; Han CH; Jang J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 50(22):12365-12372. PubMed ID: 27786464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bioaerosol and surface sampling for the surveillance of influenza A virus in swine.
    Prost K; Kloeze H; Mukhi S; Bozek K; Poljak Z; Mubareka S
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2019 May; 66(3):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 30715792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Detection of infectious bursal disease vaccine viruses in lymphoid tissues after in ovo vaccination of specific-pathogen-free embryos.
    Corley MM; Giambrone JJ; Dormitorio TV
    Avian Dis; 2001; 45(4):897-905. PubMed ID: 11785894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Performance Evaluation and Validation of Air Samplers To Detect Aerosolized Coxiella burnetii.
    Abeykoon AMH; Poon M; Firestone SM; Stevenson MA; Wiethoelter AK; Vincent GA
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct; 10(5):e0065522. PubMed ID: 36073825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Application of flow cytometry for the assessment of preservation and recovery efficiency of bioaerosol samplers spiked with Pantoea agglomerans.
    Rule AM; Kesavan J; Schwab KJ; Buckley TJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2467-72. PubMed ID: 17438801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.