These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A comparison of Japanese and Australian consumers' sensory perceptions of beef. Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R Anim Sci J; 2014 Jan; 85(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23773578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Japanese consumer categorisation of beef into quality grades, based on Meat Standards Australia methodology. Polkinghorne RJ; Nishimura T; Neath KE; Watson R Anim Sci J; 2011 Apr; 82(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 21729214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer assessment of beef tenderloin steaks from various USDA quality grades at 3 degrees of doneness. O'Quinn TG; Brooks JC; Miller MF J Food Sci; 2015 Feb; 80(2):S444-9. PubMed ID: 25597832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Descriptive beef flavor and texture attributes relationships with consumer acceptance of US light beef eaters. Miller RK; Luckemeyer TJ; Kerth CR; Adhikari K Meat Sci; 2023 Oct; 204():109252. PubMed ID: 37321053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades. Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of calcium chloride-injected top sirloin steaks when given instructions for preparation. Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW J Anim Sci; 2005 Dec; 83(12):2869-75. PubMed ID: 16282626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluating consumer acceptability of various muscles from the beef chuck and rib. Kukowski AC; Maddock RJ; Wulf DM J Anim Sci; 2004 Feb; 82(2):521-5. PubMed ID: 14974551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of estrogen-trenbolone acetate implants on tenderness and consumer acceptability of beef under the effect of 2 aging times. Igo JL; Brooks JC; Johnson BJ; Starkey J; Rathmann RJ; Garmyn AJ; Nichols WT; Hutcheson JP; Miller MF J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 21346138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of beef tenderness and juiciness using consumer and descriptive sensory attributes. Martinez HA; Miller RK; Kerth C; Wasser BE Meat Sci; 2023 Nov; 205():109292. PubMed ID: 37611462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride to beef and calf-fed Holstein cattle on consumer palatability ratings. Mehaffey JM; Brooks JC; Rathmann RJ; Alsup EM; Hutcheson JP; Nichols WT; Streeter MN; Yates DA; Johnson BJ; Miller MF J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3712-21. PubMed ID: 19717772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Beef customer satisfaction: role of cut, USDA quality grade, and city on in-home consumer ratings. Neely TR; Lorenzen CL; Miller RK; Tatum JD; Wise JW; Taylor JF; Buyck MJ; Reagan JO; Savell JW J Anim Sci; 1998 Apr; 76(4):1027-33. PubMed ID: 9581926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes. Emerson MR; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Tatum JD J Anim Sci; 2013 Feb; 91(2):1024-34. PubMed ID: 23148250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consumer palatability scores, sensory descriptive attributes, and volatile compounds of grilled beef steaks from three USDA Quality Grades. Legako JF; Dinh TT; Miller MF; Adhikari K; Brooks JC Meat Sci; 2016 Feb; 112():77-85. PubMed ID: 26555563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of a beef flavor lexicon and its application to compare the flavor profile and consumer acceptance of rib steaks from grass- or grain-fed cattle. Maughan C; Tansawat R; Cornforth D; Ward R; Martini S Meat Sci; 2012 Jan; 90(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 21703775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]