220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25292294)
1. Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I.
Warwick J; Birke H; Stone J; Warren RM; Pinney E; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW; Howell A; Cuzick J
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Oct; 16(5):451. PubMed ID: 25292294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.
Brentnall AR; Harkness EF; Astley SM; Donnelly LS; Stavrinos P; Sampson S; Fox L; Sergeant JC; Harvie MN; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Howell A; Cuzick J; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Dec; 17(1):147. PubMed ID: 26627479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Background risk of breast cancer and the association between physical activity and mammographic density.
Trinh T; Eriksson M; Darabi H; Bonn SE; Brand JS; Cuzick J; Czene K; Sjölander A; Bälter K; Hall P
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Apr; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 25888057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tamoxifen-induced reduction in mammographic density and breast cancer risk reduction: a nested case-control study.
Cuzick J; Warwick J; Pinney E; Duffy SW; Cawthorn S; Howell A; Forbes JF; Warren RM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 May; 103(9):744-52. PubMed ID: 21483019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of area- and volumetric-mammographic density and breast cancer risk in women of Asian descent: a case control study.
Mariapun S; Ho WK; Eriksson M; Mohd Taib NA; Yip CH; Rahmat K; Hall P; Teo SH
Breast Cancer Res; 2024 May; 26(1):79. PubMed ID: 38750574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.
Keller BM; Chen J; Daye D; Conant EF; Kontos D
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Aug; 17():117. PubMed ID: 26303303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.
Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Buist DSM; Bowles EJA
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Sep; 4(9):e180174. PubMed ID: 29621362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density.
Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Harkness EF; Rafiq S; Byers H; Astley SM; Sampson S; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J; Evans DGR
Int J Cancer; 2020 Apr; 146(8):2122-2129. PubMed ID: 31251818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A case-control study to assess the impact of mammographic density on breast cancer risk in women aged 40-49 at intermediate familial risk.
Assi V; Massat NJ; Thomas S; MacKay J; Warwick J; Kataoka M; Warsi I; Brentnall A; Warren R; Duffy SW
Int J Cancer; 2015 May; 136(10):2378-87. PubMed ID: 25333209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic density reduction is a prognostic marker of response to adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.
Li J; Humphreys K; Eriksson L; Edgren G; Czene K; Hall P
J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 31(18):2249-56. PubMed ID: 23610119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density.
Hart V; Reeves KW; Sturgeon SR; Reich NG; Sievert LL; Kerlikowske K; Ma L; Shepherd J; Tice JA; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Sprague BL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2015 Nov; 24(11):1724-30. PubMed ID: 26315554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammographic texture resemblance generalizes as an independent risk factor for breast cancer.
Nielsen M; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Chernoff K; Karemore G; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M; Karsdal MA
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Apr; 16(2):R37. PubMed ID: 24713478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer survival: the Multiethnic Cohort.
Maskarinec G; Pagano IS; Little MA; Conroy SM; Park SY; Kolonel LN
Breast Cancer Res; 2013 Jan; 15(1):R7. PubMed ID: 23339436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Novel Associations between Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Risk-Predicting Mammographic Density Measures.
Stone J; Thompson DJ; Dos Santos Silva I; Scott C; Tamimi RM; Lindstrom S; Kraft P; Hazra A; Li J; Eriksson L; Czene K; Hall P; Jensen M; Cunningham J; Olson JE; Purrington K; Couch FJ; Brown J; Leyland J; Warren RM; Luben RN; Khaw KT; Smith P; Wareham NJ; Jud SM; Heusinger K; Beckmann MW; Douglas JA; Shah KP; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Le Marchand L; Kolonel LN; Woolcott C; Maskarinec G; Haiman C; Giles GG; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Southey MC; Apicella C; Andrulis IL; Knight JA; Ursin G; Alnaes GI; Kristensen VN; Borresen-Dale AL; Gram IT; Bolla MK; Wang Q; Michailidou K; Dennis J; Simard J; Pharoah P; Dunning AM; Easton DF; Fasching PA; Pankratz VS; Hopper JL; Vachon CM
Cancer Res; 2015 Jun; 75(12):2457-67. PubMed ID: 25862352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
