These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Corneal assessment technologies: current status. Rio-Cristobal A; Martin R Surv Ophthalmol; 2014; 59(6):599-614. PubMed ID: 25223496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Schleimpflug photography detects alterations in corneal density and thickness in patients with dry eye disease]. Meyer LM; Kronschläger M; Wegener AR Ophthalmologe; 2014 Oct; 111(10):914-9. PubMed ID: 25278346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Possibilities for use of Scheimpflug technology in cataract surgery]. Handzel DM; Meyer CH; Wegener A Ophthalmologe; 2014 Oct; 111(10):927-34. PubMed ID: 25278344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of corneal thickness using a Scheimpflug-Placido disk corneal analyzer and comparison with ultrasound pachymetry in eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis. Huang J; Lu W; Savini G; Hu L; Pan C; Wang J; Tan W; Chen J; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jul; 39(7):1074-80. PubMed ID: 23680632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy, Ultrasonic Pachymetry, and Scheimpflug Topography for Measuring Central Corneal Thickness. MeenakshiSundaram S; Sufi AR; Prajna NV; Keenan JD JAMA Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 134(9):1057-9. PubMed ID: 27415451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precision of a new Scheimpflug and Placido-disk analyzer in measuring corneal thickness and agreement with ultrasound pachymetry. Huang J; Savini G; Hu L; Hoffer KJ; Lu W; Feng Y; Yang F; Hu X; Wang Q J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Feb; 39(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 23218819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Agreement between Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Pentacam Scheimpflug Camera, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Ultrasonographic Pachymetry in Diabetic Patients. Altay Y; Balta O; Demirok G; Burcu A; Balta OB; Ornek F Curr Eye Res; 2017 Feb; 42(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 27348734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Corneal topography. Analysis of the corneal surface]. Herrmann C; Ludwig U; Duncker G Ophthalmologe; 2008 Feb; 105(2):193-204; quiz 205-6. PubMed ID: 18265992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices. Doğan M; Ertan E Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):126-130. PubMed ID: 30557910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using optical low-coherence reflectometry, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography, and Scheimpflug camera. Gonul S; Koktekir BE; Bakbak B; Gedik S Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 25627178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement characteristics of rotating Scheimpflug photography and scanning-slit corneal topography for corneal power measurement. Kawamorita T; Uozato H; Kamiya K; Bax L; Tsutsui K; Aizawa D; Shimizu K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 19101435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Criticality of the measurement of corneal thickness in specular reflection by digital biomicroscope. Marelli A; De Vita IR; Cozza F; Tavazzi S Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2018 Dec; 41(6):531-537. PubMed ID: 30197039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]