BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25293635)

  • 1. Retraction Note to: Preference for immediate reinforcement over delayed reinforcement: relation between delay discounting and health behavior.
    J Behav Med; 2014 Dec; 37(6):1263. PubMed ID: 25293635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retraction Note to: Preference for immediate reinforcement over delayed reinforcement: relation between delay discounting and health behavior.
    J Behav Med; 2015 Oct; 38(5):835. PubMed ID: 26613108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acquisition of operant behavior in rats with delayed reinforcement: A retractable-lever procedure.
    McNamara AA; Johnson LE; Tate C; Chiang T; Byrne T
    Behav Processes; 2015 Feb; 111():37-41. PubMed ID: 25464338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of Group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude and delayed reinforcement in a delay-discounting task in rats: Contribution of delay presentation order.
    Yates JR; Rogers KK; Gunkel BT; Prior NA; Hughes MN; Sharpe SM; Campbell HL; Johnson AB; Keller MG; Breitenstein KA; Shults HN
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 322(Pt A):29-33. PubMed ID: 28088471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shallow discounting of delayed cocaine by male rhesus monkeys when immediate food is the choice alternative.
    Huskinson SL; Myerson J; Green L; Rowlett JK; Woolverton WL; Freeman KB
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2016 Dec; 24(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27929348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement.
    Dallery J; Raiff BR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2007 Mar; 190(4):485-96. PubMed ID: 17205320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Delay discounting of food by rhesus monkeys: Cocaine and food choice in isomorphic and allomorphic situations.
    Huskinson SL; Woolverton WL; Green L; Myerson J; Freeman KB
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2015 Jun; 23(3):184-93. PubMed ID: 25938515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delay discounting of hypothetical and real money: the effect of holding reinforcement rate constant.
    Dixon MR; Lik NM; Green L; Myerson J
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2013; 46(2):512-7. PubMed ID: 24114165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Delay discounting of cocaine by rhesus monkeys.
    Woolverton WL; Myerson J; Green L
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2007 Jun; 15(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 17563210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impulsive choice and pre-exposure to delays: III. Four-month test-retest outcomes in male wistar rats.
    Renda CR; Madden GJ
    Behav Processes; 2016 May; 126():108-12. PubMed ID: 27016155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Delay-specific stimuli and genotype interact to determine temporal discounting in a rapid-acquisition procedure.
    Pope DA; Newland MC; Hutsell BA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 May; 103(3):450-71. PubMed ID: 25869302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Human choices between variable and fixed rewards in hypothetical variable-delay and double-reward discounting procedures.
    McKerchar TL; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 Jul; 106(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 27353633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of reinforcer magnitude on probability and delay discounting of experienced outcomes in a computer game task in humans.
    Greenhow AK; Hunt MJ; Macaskill AC; Harper DN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Sep; 104(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 26377438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nucleus accumbens lesions decrease sensitivity to rapid changes in the delay to reinforcement.
    Acheson A; Farrar AM; Patak M; Hausknecht KA; Kieres AK; Choi S; de Wit H; Richards JB
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 173(2):217-28. PubMed ID: 16884790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A second type of magnitude effect: Reinforcer magnitude differentiates delay discounting between substance users and controls.
    Mellis AM; Woodford AE; Stein JS; Bickel WK
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):151-160. PubMed ID: 28101922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A hyperbolic decay of subjective probability of obtaining delayed rewards.
    Takahashi T; Ikeda K; Hasegawa T
    Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Sep; 3():52. PubMed ID: 17892596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAr) uncompetitive antagonists in a delay discounting paradigm using a concurrent-chains procedure.
    Yates JR; Gunkel BT; Rogers KK; Breitenstein KA; Hughes MN; Johnson AB; Sharpe SM
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Sep; 349():125-129. PubMed ID: 29604367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal discounting of aversive consequences in rats.
    Rodríguez W; Bouzas A; Orduña V
    Learn Behav; 2018 Mar; 46(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 28643142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of different fixed-ratio requirements on delay discounting in rats.
    Huskinson SL; Anderson KG
    Behav Processes; 2013 Nov; 100():18-22. PubMed ID: 23891790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.